This post provides an in-depth discussion of the criminal procedure core assessment of Earl Warren and William Rehnquist below. The essay compares and contrasts the approaches to criminal procedure by the U.S. Supreme Court under both Chief Justices Earl Warren and William Rehnquist. The points on interest include their significant decisions and the effects they had on the balance between social order maintenance and individual liberties, among others.

• the effects of the Supreme Court’s decisions on law enforcement in the United States.
• the Supreme Court’s current approach to balancing civil liberties against public order maintenance.

Introduction

The core assessment for this course is a written essay comparing and contrasting the approaches to criminal procedure by the U.S. Supreme Court under both Chief Justices Earl Warren and William Rehnquist.

Directions

For this assignment, you need to complete your core assessment. Please review the requirements of the assignment.

The essay should address:

• their significant decisions and the effects they had on the balance between social order maintenance and individual liberties.
• the effects of the Supreme Court’s decisions on law enforcement in the United States.
• the Supreme Court’s current approach to balancing civil liberties against public order maintenance.

Caution: Do not get sidetracked by the landmark court decisions that do not reflect criminal procedure. Brown v. the Board of Education and Roe V. Wade are cases of monumental importance, but they are not criminal procedure decisions.

The essay must include:

• Cover page
• Introduction
• 6 to 8 typewritten double spaced pages about 2000 words on the above subject
• Reference page containing a minimum of six external course sources
• Must be written in APA or MLA style

Click here for further assistance on this assignment