Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Considering Frye, Daubert, and Federal Rules of Evidence 702 for evidence admissibility, which of the three do you acknowledge as the most effective court ruling? Why?

03 Oct 2022,7:27 PM

 

Considering Frye, Daubert, and Federal Rules of Evidence 702 for evidence admissibility, which of the three do you acknowledge as the most effective court ruling? Why? Which of the three do you acknowledge as the least effect court ruling? Why?

Expert answer

 

The Frye standard is the most effective court ruling when considering evidence admissibility. The reason for this is that the Frye standard takes into account all of the relevant factors when determining whether or not the evidence is admissible. In contrast, the Daubert standard only takes into account one factor (i.e., whether or not the evidence is reliable). As a result, the Frye standard is more likely to result in accurate decisions about evidence admissibility.

 

The least effective court ruling when considering evidence admissibility is the Federal Rules of Evidence 702. The reason for this is that the Federal Rules of Evidence 702 do not take into account any of the relevant factors when determining whether or not the evidence is admissible. As a result, decisions about evidence admissibility made under the Federal Rules of Evidence 702 are likely to be inaccurate.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us