Considering Frye, Daubert, and Federal Rules of Evidence 702 for evidence admissibility, which of the three do you acknowledge as the most effective court ruling? Why? Which of the three do you acknowledge as the least effect court ruling? Why?
The Frye standard is the most effective court ruling when considering evidence admissibility. The reason for this is that the Frye standard takes into account all of the relevant factors when determining whether or not the evidence is admissible. In contrast, the Daubert standard only takes into account one factor (i.e., whether or not the evidence is reliable). As a result, the Frye standard is more likely to result in accurate decisions about evidence admissibility.
Copyright © 2012 - 2025 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.