Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Crises often bring out a desire for strong leaders. Critically discuss this statement with reference to some examples

21 Apr 2023,1:18 PM

 

1: Critically analyse and reflect upon two or more instances of leadership/followership that you have personally experienced, drawing on key perspectives, theories, or concepts from the module.


2. ‘Contemporary leadership and followership dynamics are shaped by an excessive concern with the management of impressions.’ Drawing on relevant theories, outline the extent to which you agree with this
statement and why?


3. Critically analyse the “Leaders as Mood and Emotion Managers” perspective on leadership.


4. Crises often bring out a desire for strong leaders. Critically discuss this statement with reference to some examples

Expert answer

 

Throughout history, crises have frequently led to the rise of strong leaders. These leaders, often seen as charismatic figures, have been able to gain power by appealing to the emotions and fears of the people. The question is, why do crises bring out a desire for strong leaders? This paper will critically discuss this statement, with reference to some examples from history.

Throughout history, crises have frequently led to the rise of strong leaders. These leaders, often seen as charismatic figures, have been able to gain power by appealing to the emotions and fears of the people. The question is, why do crises bring out a desire for strong leaders? This paper will critically discuss this statement, with reference to some examples from history.

What are crises?

Before delving into the topic, it is important to define what a crisis is. A crisis can be defined as an event or situation that is unstable, uncertain, and potentially dangerous. Crises can take many forms, including natural disasters, economic downturns, wars, and pandemics. What all crises have in common is that they disrupt the normal functioning of society and can cause great suffering.

Why do crises bring out a desire for strong leaders?

Crises create a sense of urgency and fear among the population. People become anxious about the future, and they want someone to lead them out of the crisis. In times of crisis, people often turn to strong leaders who promise to provide stability, security, and a way out of the crisis. Strong leaders are seen as capable of making tough decisions and taking bold action. They are seen as providing a sense of direction and purpose, which is particularly important in times of uncertainty.

One of the main reasons why crises bring out a desire for strong leaders is that people feel a sense of helplessness. They feel that they are unable to control the situation, and they look to leaders to provide guidance and direction. In times of crisis, people are willing to put their trust in a leader who they believe can solve the problem.

Another reason why crises bring out a desire for strong leaders is that people feel a need for strong leadership. Strong leaders are seen as providing a sense of stability and order in chaotic situations. They are seen as able to make tough decisions and take bold action, which can be reassuring in times of uncertainty. People feel that strong leaders are more capable of dealing with crises than weak leaders.

Examples of strong leaders in times of crisis:

Throughout history, crises have led to the rise of strong leaders. Here are some examples:

Winston Churchill:

During World War II, Winston Churchill became the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He was seen as a strong leader who was able to provide a sense of direction and purpose during a time of crisis. Churchill's speeches, such as his "We shall fight on the beaches" speech, inspired the British people to keep fighting in the face of adversity. Churchill was seen as a wartime leader who was willing to make tough decisions and take bold action.

Franklin D. Roosevelt:

During the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt became the President of the United States. He was seen as a strong leader who was able to provide stability and direction during a time of economic crisis. Roosevelt's New Deal programs, such as the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Social Security Act, helped to alleviate the suffering of the American people. Roosevelt was seen as a leader who was willing to take bold action to address the problems facing the country.

Nelson Mandela:

During apartheid in South Africa, Nelson Mandela became a strong leader who fought for the rights of black South Africans. He was imprisoned for 27 years, but he never lost his sense of purpose or his commitment to justice. After he was released from prison, he became the President of South Africa and worked to bring about reconciliation and healing in a deeply divided society. Mandela was seen as a leader who was able to provide direction and purpose during a time of crisis.

Vladimir Putin:

During the economic crisis in Russia in the 1990s, Vladimir Putin became a strong leader who was able to provide stability and direction. He was appointed as the Director of the Federal Security Service in 1998, and later became the President of Russia in 2000. Putin implemented economic reforms that stabilized the Russian economy and restored its international standing. Putin was seen as a strong leader who was able to make tough decisions and take bold action to address the problems facing Russia.

Adolf Hitler:

One of the most infamous examples of a strong leader who came to power during a crisis is Adolf Hitler. Hitler rose to power in Germany during the economic crisis of the 1930s, and he promised to restore Germany to greatness. Hitler was seen as a strong leader who was able to provide direction and purpose during a time of uncertainty. However, Hitler's leadership style was characterized by authoritarianism, propaganda, and violence. He ultimately led Germany into World War II and committed atrocities against millions of people.

Critique of strong leaders in times of crisis:

While strong leaders can be effective in times of crisis, there are also risks associated with their leadership style. Strong leaders often have a tendency towards authoritarianism, and they may be willing to sacrifice individual rights and freedoms for the sake of stability and security. They may also be prone to making decisions based on their own personal beliefs rather than on objective evidence.

Another risk associated with strong leaders is that they may become too powerful. When a leader has too much power, they may become corrupt or abusive. They may also become isolated from the people they are supposed to be leading and lose touch with the realities of everyday life.

In addition, strong leaders can be divisive. They may appeal to a particular group of people, while alienating others. This can lead to social and political polarization, which can make it more difficult to solve the underlying problems that caused the crisis in the first place.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, crises often bring out a desire for strong leaders. People feel a sense of urgency and fear, and they want someone to lead them out of the crisis. Strong leaders are seen as capable of making tough decisions and taking bold action. They are seen as providing a sense of direction and purpose, which is particularly important in times of uncertainty.

However, there are risks associated with strong leaders. They may become authoritarian, too powerful, or divisive. It is important to be aware of these risks and to ensure that strong leaders are held accountable for their actions.

Furthermore, it is important to note that strong leadership is not the only solution to a crisis. Collaborative leadership, where leaders work together to find solutions, can also be effective in addressing the problems facing society. Ultimately, the most effective response to a crisis will depend on the specific circumstances and the needs of the people affected.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

WhatsApp us