Hand in location: (tick as appropriate)

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS Course:

Module Title: Module Code:

Assignment Title: Weighting:

 

Date Set:
Submission Date and Time: Expected Return:

Stoke

Turnitin via Blackboard

✓

BA (Hon)

Global Supply Chain & Logistics BUSM50001

Assessment: Individual report Assessment: 100%

 

20 working days from submission day

Assignment Timetable:

Learning Outcomes (LO) to be Assessed:

LO1. Demonstrate an understanding of developments in globalisation within the context of contemporary practice in supply chain management and in so doing critically assess the role of supply chain management as a key source of competitive advantage. (Knowledge and Understanding)

LO2. Analyse and evaluate challenges in design of competitive supply chain architecture within the context of cultural, ethical & technological evolution. (Analysis)
LO3. Evaluate future challenges international supply chain management and their implication in sustaining competitive advantage. (Problem solving)

Assignment set by: Marzena Reszka

Assignment verified by: Verification panel

Page 1 of 10

Assessment Brief Semester 1, 2020-2021 INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT (100%)

You are required to answer all questions.

Q1. Critically analyse the global supply chain and logistics challenges faced by organisations. You are required to conduct independent research to support your answer with relevant theory/ journals and examples. [Weighted 35%] Suggested word limit = 800 words

Q2. You are required to conduct independent research on the supply chain management strategy of Samsung Electronics and compile a report that covers all of the following questions:

(You must provide answers to both questions 2a and 2b)

2a. Identify the differences of priorities among Samsung Electronics and Apple Inc. How could supply chain decisions impact on the competitive priorities of each organisation? [Weighted 30%] Suggested word limit = 600 words

2b. Electronic goods manufacturers have a responsibility to reduce e-waste. How can an organisation become a ‘socially responsible organisation’ by implementing “Reverse Supply Chain”? What are the future challenges that companies like Samsung Electronics and Apple may face in implementing reverse supply chain? [Weighted 30%] Suggested word limit = 600 words]

All your answers should be supported with relevant company specific examples and academic theory.

Other considerations for question 1 and 2

Logical structure of the report, correct use of referencing, language proficiency and coherence. [Weighted 5%]

Page 2 of 10

Allocation of marks	Weighting %
Question 1	35%
Question 2 – 2a – 2b	30% 30%
3.Other considerations	5%

The suggested word limits shown above are advisory in nature. They indicate the recommended lengths for each section. However, it is acceptable for students to adjust the number of words in each section if they feel it necessary, on condition that the overall word limit for the assignment is not exceeded and the answers for each section are adequate.

Instructions:
The report must adhere to standard academic documentation standards:

• Use appropriate citation and reference according to the Harvard Referencing format in order to avoid plagiarism. Cases of plagiarism will be penalised in accordance to University regulation.
• Use font type Times New Roman.
• Use font size of 12 pts.
• Use 1.5-line spacing.
• Use your own words to convince that you understand what you are writing, and not

just ‘copy and paste’. Your own words must account for not less than 80% of the total

word count.

• Write within 2000 words, excluding appendices, diagrams, figures, tables etc.; the

appendices, if needed, should be limited to 2 pages.

Page 3 of 10

Maximum Word Length

State the number of words used on the assignment front sheet. You may include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. A sliding scale of penalties for excess length will be imposed according to the amount by which the limit has been exceeded.

1-10% excess 11-20% excess 21-30% excess 31%+ excess

no penalty
10% reduction in the mark 20% reduction in the mark

the work will be capped at a pass

1. None of the above penalties will be used to change your mark which is above the pass mark, to one that is below the pass mark. Therefore, the maximum penalty for exceeding the word limit will be a reduction to a pass grade.

Note: Title, reference list, appendices, tables (succinct with bullet points), graphs and figures used within the main body of the report are excluded from the word count.

Useful Information:

Library resources, study and research skills: http://libguides.staffs.ac.uk/libraryresources/

Exceptional Circumstances:

https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/exceptional-circumstances-procedure.jsp https://www.staffs.ac.uk/support_depts/info_centre/handbook/exceptional/

Regulations: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/Acadregs.jsp

Academic Conduct: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/legal/policies/academic-conduct- procedure.jsp

Page 4 of 10

Module Code: BUSM50001 Module title: Global Supply Chain and Logistics

Generic Undergraduate Assessment Criteria Level 5

Learning Outcome	First class			Upper second	Lower second	Third	Fail
	90-100%	80-89%	70-79%	60-69%	50-59%	40-49%	30-39%	20-29%	Below 20%
Knowledge and Understanding Learning Enquiry	Exceptional answer demonstrating a highly-detailed understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter- relationship with other fields of study; clear appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Exceptional presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.	An outstanding answer demonstrating a detailed understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; awareness of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. Excellent presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.	Excellent knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study; clear awareness of the limits of knowledge. Very good presentation of qualitative and quantitative data.	Very good knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. Some understanding of limits of knowledge. Good presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.	Systematic knowledge and understanding of the issues and methodologies, concepts, theories and/or data and its inter-relationship with other fields of study. May contain minor errors and/or discussion of irrelevant issues. Adequate presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.	Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the key issues raised by the question; coherent knowledge and understanding of its inter- relationship with other fields of study. Limited presentation and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data.	Unsatisfactory, but shows a limited grasp of some relevant issues. Limited awareness of ambiguity of knowledge, or ability to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data.	An attempt to answer the question, but without any significant grasp of material or appropriate skills. Minimal application of knowledge, or use of information.	No answer offered; or an answer which is totally irrelevant or fundamentally wrong. Shows some evidence of having benefited from the course.
Analysis Application Problem Solving	Original, independent thinking, rigorous argument and an impressive use of evidence. Thorough and accurate analysis of subject with evidence of breadth and depth of study. Excellent application of	Outstanding analysis displaying independent thought and strong, well-organised argument and highly competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems.	Excellent analysis displaying independent thought and strong and well-organised argument, competent application of evidence and theory to solve problems.	A very good analysis and well- organised argument, very well supported by evidence. Evidence applied well to provide solution to problems.	Good analysis and argument, well supported by evidence. Good application of evidence and theory to solve problem.	Arguments and analysis adequate, accurate and supported by evidence, but may be superficial or limited. Some application of evidence and theory to solve problem.	Argument and analysis may be illogical, irrelevant, or contradictory in places and/or unsupported by evidence. Limited application of evidence and theory to solve problem.	Brief, irrelevant or deficient argument and analysis; unsubstantiated generalisations. Little or no attempt to draw conclusions. Little or no attempt to apply evidence and theory to solve problem.	Absence of analysis and argument. No evidence of application of knowledge to solve problem. Or no answer offered.

Page 5 of 10

	theory to problem.
Communication Reflection	Exceptionally effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Exceptional demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Extremely effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Excellent demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Highly effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Extremely good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Very effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Good demonstration of managing own learning and initiative, learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Effective communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline. Demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Generally satisfactory communication skills appropriate to the level of study, task, audience and discipline but with evident weaknesses. Adequate demonstration of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Unsatisfactory communication skills appropriate to this level of study. Poor level of learning ability, qualities or skills necessary for employment.	Some evidence of communication skills appropriate to this level of study.	Limited or no evidence of the communication skills appropriate to this level of study. Limited or no evidence of managing own learning or initiative.
Professional Requirement (Not usually weighted and usually a pass/fail component of assessment)	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Meets the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Fails to meet the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Fails to meet the competencies or standards of proficiency required by professional/ statutory or regulating bodies.	Breach of confidentiality of individuals/ organisations from a practice learning setting.

Page 6 of 10

Page 7 of 10

Page 8 of 10

Page 9 of 10

Page 10 of 10

 

 

APA

 

 

Click here for further assistance on this assignment