Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Critically evaluate the theory of comparative advantage; Explain the different types of risks confronting an interest rate and currency swap dealer.

20 Oct 2022,11:26 PM

 

 

Question 1 (A)

 

The following spot exchange rates are currently being quoted by three different banks:

 

JP Morgan offers a spot rate of € 0.0071-0.0079/¥ Societe Generale offers a spot rate of € 0.879-0.888/$ Bank of America offers a spot rate of ¥ 100.9-101.5/$

 

Required:

 

(i) Calculate the implied cross exchange rate between the euro (€) and the yen (¥).

(10 marks)

 

(ii) Demonstrate how an arbitrageur could make a profit from this situation and calculate the amount of the profit if 1m (millions) dollars ($) was arbitraged. You need to show all your workings.

(15 marks)

 

(iii) Now assume that you have ¥ 50m instead of $ 1m. Calculate the profit that can be made through triangular arbitrage. You need to show all your workings.

(15 marks)

 

(B)

 

The 3-month forward rate dollar($)/sterling(£) is currently $ 1.33/£. Based on your analysis of the exchange rate, you are quite confident that the spot exchange rate will be $ 1.31/£ in 3 months’ time. Assume you want to speculate on the $/£ spot rate by buying or selling £ 5m (millions) in the forward market.

 

Required:

 

(i) Explain how you could speculate in the forward market and calculate your expected $ outcome from the speculation.

(15 marks)

 

(ii) Calculate your speculative $ outcome if the spot exchange rate actually turns out to be $ 1.36/£.

(15 marks)

 

(iii) Illustrate both speculative outcomes in a payoff diagram.

(10 marks)

 

(C)

 

Critically evaluate the theory of comparative advantage.

(20 marks)

 

(Total 100 marks)

 

 

Question 2

 

(A)

 

The spot exchange rate today is $0.85/A$ and the one-year forward exchange rate is $0.81/A$. One-year interest is 3.5% in the United States and 4.2% in Australia. You may borrow up to $1,000,000 or A$1,176,471, which is equivalent to $1,000,000 at the current spot rate.

 

Required:

 

(i)        Determine if interest rate parity (IRP) is holding between Australia and the United States. (10 marks)

 

(ii)       If IRP is not holding, explain in detail how you would realize certain profit in U.S. dollar terms. You need to show all your workings.

(10 marks)

 

(iii)       Explain how IRP will be restored as a result of arbitrage transactions you carry out above. (10 marks)

 

(B)

 

Global Transport (GT), a Swedish transport company with subsidiaries all over Asia, has been funding its Kuala Lumpur subsidiary, GT-Malaysia, primarily with U.S. Dollar ($) debt, because of the cost and availability of Dollar capital, as opposed to with Malaysian Ringgit-denominated (MYR) debt. The treasurer of GT-Malaysia is considering a one-year bank loan for $ 1,500,000. The current spot rate is MYR 4.31/$, and the Dollar-based interest is 4.75% for the one year period. One year loans are available at 10.00% interest in MYR.

 

Note: Assume there are 360 days in a year.

 

Required:

 

(i)        For the forthcoming year, according to the purchasing power parity relationship and assuming expected inflation rates of 3.8% and 0.50% in Malaysia and the United States, respectively, what would the effective cost of funds be in MYR terms?

(15 marks)

 

(ii)       If GT-Malaysia's foreign exchange advisers believe strongly that the Malaysian government wants to push the value of the MYR down against the dollar by 2.5% over the coming year, what might the effective cost of funds end up being in MYR terms? Would this change the funding strategy?

(15 marks)

 

(iii)      If GT-Malaysia could borrow MYR at 8% per annum, would this be cheaper than the funding sources on offer in either part (i) or part (ii) above?

(10 marks)

 

(iv)      Discuss why the purchasing power parity may not hold in reality.

(30 marks)

 

(Total 100 marks)

 

 

Question 3

 

(A)

 

Suppose you are a Scottish venture capitalist holding a major stake in an e-commerce start-up in Silicon Valley. As a Scottish resident, you are concerned with the pound value of your U.S. equity position. Assume that if the American economy booms in the future, your equity stake will be worth $1,000,000, and the exchange rate will be $1.40/£. If the American economy experiences a recession, on the other hand, your American equity stake will be worth $500,000, and the exchange rate will be $1.60/£. You assess that the American economy will experience a boom with a 70 percent probability and a recession with a 30 percent probability.

 

Required:

 

(i)        Estimate your exposure to the exchange risk.

(15 marks)

 

(ii)       Compute the variance of the pound value of your American equity position that is attributable to the exchange rate uncertainty.

(15 marks)

 

(iii)      How would you hedge this exposure? If you hedge, what is the variance of the pound value of the hedged position?

(15 marks)

 

(B)

 

Company Alpha is an A-rated firm desiring to issue five-year floating-rate notes (FRNs). Company Alpha finds that it can issue FRNs at six-month LIBOR + 0.125 percent or at three-month LIBOR + 0.125 percent. Given its asset structure, three-month LIBOR is the preferred index. Company Beta is a B-rated firm that also desires to issue five-year FRNs. Company Beta finds it can issue at six-month LIBOR + 1.0 percent or at three-month LIBOR + 0.625 percent. Given its asset structure, six-month LIBOR is the preferred index. Assume a notional principal of $15,000,000.

 

Required:

(i)        Calculate the quality spread differential (QSD).

(10 marks)

(ii)       Set up a floating-for-floating rate swap where the swap bank receives 0.125 percent and the two counterparties share the remaining savings equally.

(20 marks)

 

(C)

 

Explain the different types of risks confronting an interest rate and currency swap dealer.

(25 marks)

 

(Total 100 marks)

 

 

 

Question 4

 

(A)

 

A French aircraft manufacturer, BAM Ltd., sold an aircraft to American Airlines, a U.S. company, and billed $30 million payable in six months. BAM is concerned with the euro proceeds from international sales and would like to control exchange risk. The current spot exchange rate is $1.05/€and six-month forward exchange rate is $1.10/€ at themoment. BAMcanbuya six-month put option on U.S. dollars with a strike price of €0.95/$ for a premium of €0.02 per U.S. dollar. Currently, six-month interest rate is 2.5% in the euro zone and 3.0% in the U.S.

 

Required:

 

(i)        Compute the guaranteed euro proceeds from the American sale if BAM decides to hedge using a forward contract.

(10 marks)

 

(ii)       If BAM decides to hedge using money market instruments, what action does BAM need to take? What would be the guaranteed euro proceeds from the American sale in this case?

(20 marks)

 

 

(iii)      If BAM decides to hedge using put options on U.S. dollars, what would be the ‘expected’ euro proceeds from the American sale? Assume that BAM regards the current forward exchange rate as an unbiased predictor of the future spot exchange rate.

(20 marks)

 

(iv)      At what future spot exchange rate do you think BAM will be indifferent between the option and money market hedge?

(15 marks)

 

 

(B)

 

According to a recent survey of corporate foreign exchange risk management practices, many firms simply do not hedge foreign exchange risk.

 

Required:

 

(i)        Discuss the possible reasons why some firms, in this survey, do not hedge foreign exchange risk.

(15 marks)

 

(ii)       Discuss the reasons why you, as an expert on international financial management, may want to suggest that firms need to hedge foreign exchange risk.

(20 marks)

 

(Total 100 marks)

 

 

Formula Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

Currency Depreciation

 

 

 

Currency Appreciation

 

 

 

Forward Premium/Discount

 

 

Purchasing Power Parity

 

International Fisher Effect

 

Interest Rate Parity

 

(St - St+1) St+1

 

(St+1 - St ) St

 

 

*

t

(F -St )            360

 

St                #days contract

 

E(e) = p$ - p£

 

E(e) = i$ -

 

(F-S)/S = ( i$ - i£) / (1 + i£)

 

Expert answer

 

Critically evaluate the theory of comparative advantage

The theory of comparative advantage is one of the most important concepts in international trade. It is the basis for the argument that free trade is beneficial for all countries involved. The theory was first put forward by David Ricardo in 1817, and has since been the subject of extensive economic research.

 

The basic idea behind comparative advantage is that each country should specialize in producing the goods and services that it can produce more efficiently than other countries. By doing so, all countries can benefit from the increased efficiency and productivity.

 

There are a number of criticisms of the theory of comparative advantage. One is that it does not account for the fact that some countries may have an absolute advantage in production, due to factors such as natural resources or technology. Another criticism is that the theory does not account for the fact that some countries may deliberately seek to create a comparative advantage through policies such as subsidies or protectionism.

 

Despite these criticisms, the theory of comparative advantage remains an important and influential concept in international trade. It provides a strong rationale for why free trade is beneficial for all countries involved.

 

 

Explain the different types of risks confronting an interest rate and currency swap dealer.

 

There are a few different types of risks that an interest rate and currency swap dealer may face. These include counterparty risk, market risk, liquidity risk, and funding risk.

 

Counterparty risk is the risk that the other party to the swap will not fulfill their obligations. This can happen if the counterparty defaults on their payments, or if they declare bankruptcy.

 

Market risk is the risk that the value of the underlying assets will move against the position taken by the swap dealer. For example, if a swap dealer takes a long position in an interest rate swap, they will be at risk if rates rise.

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the swap dealer will not be able to find a buyer for their position when they want to exit the trade. This can happen if there is a lack of buyers in the market, or if the swap dealer's position is large and not many buyers are willing to take on that much risk.

 

Funding risk is the risk that the swap dealer will not be able to meet their obligations if rates move against them. This can happen if the swap dealer does not have enough cash on hand to cover their losses, or if they have to post collateral for their positions and the value of that collateral falls.

 

These are just a few of the risks that an interest rate and currency swap dealer may face. It is important to understand these risks before entering into any swaps transactions.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us