Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: H​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​ow would you respond to someone who presents you with the arguments proposed by Social Darwinists, OR the stories written by Horatio Alger, OR Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth (choose ONLY ONE of these), to explain the success or failures of individuals in the society?

18 Oct 2022,12:07 AM

 

H​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​ow would you respond to someone who presents you with the arguments proposed by Social Darwinists, OR the stories written by Horatio Alger, OR Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth (choose ONLY ONE of these), to explain the success or failures of individuals in the society? What evidence would you use to support your position? For this discus​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​sion, you must first identify and present their arguments, and then your counterargument. As you collect your information for this discussion you should keep in mind the opportunities that were available to many, but also the climate of racism that permeated parts of the American society and the legalized discrimination that existed​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​.

Expert answer

 

There are a few things to unpack in this question. First, it is important to understand what Social Darwinism and the stories of Horatio Alger and Andrew Carnegie are. Social Darwinism is an idea that individuals succeed or fail in society based on their own merits, and that the strong will thrive while the weak will perish. This idea was popular in the late 19th century, when many people believed that society was becoming increasingly competitive. The stories of Horatio Alger and Andrew Carnegie are both examples of this idea in action. Alger was a writer who wrote stories about young boys who rose from poverty to become wealthy and successful businessmen. Carnegie was a wealthy industrialist who believed that people could become rich if they worked hard and saved their money. Both of these ideas are based on the idea of survival of the fittest, which is a key component of Social Darwinism.

 

Now that we have a better understanding of what Social Darwinism is, let's explore how one might respond to someone who presents these ideas as fact. There are a few different ways to approach this. One could argue that Social Darwinism is not an accurate representation of how society works. This would be based on the idea that individuals succeed or fail for many reasons, and not just because of their own merits. For example, some people are born into wealthy families and have access to resources that others do not. Some people are born with physical or mental disabilities that make it harder for them to succeed in life. And some people simply have bad luck. So, while it is true that some people are more successful than others, it is not accurate to say that this is always because they are better or stronger than others.

 

Another approach would be to agree with the idea of Social Darwinism, but to argue that it is not a fair way for society to operate. This would be based on the idea that everyone should have an equal chance to succeed in life, regardless of their circumstances. This is not how society currently works, but it is something that we should strive for. After all, if we believe that everyone has the same worth and value, then it is not fair to allow some people to prosper while others suffer.

 

So, there are a few different ways to respond to someone who presents the ideas of Social Darwinism. Which approach you take will likely depend on your own beliefs about fairness and equality in society. Whichever way you choose to respond, it is important to be respectful and civil in your discussion.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us