Question: What does Raymond Williams mean when he says, ‘culture is ordinary’?

What Does Raymond Williams Mean When He Says, ‘Culture is Ordinary’?

DRAFT/STUDY TIPS:

Introduction

Raymond Williams, a seminal figure in cultural studies, radically transformed the understanding of culture with his assertion that "culture is ordinary." This notion, foundational to his broader critique of culture, society, and power, challenges traditional, elitist conceptions of culture as the exclusive domain of high art, intellectual pursuits, and sophisticated leisure. Instead, Williams posits that culture permeates everyday life, encompassing the lived experiences, practices, and values of ordinary people. This essay critically explores Williams' assertion, examining its implications for cultural theory and practice. By unpacking his argument, this analysis will demonstrate that Williams’ perspective democratizes culture, revealing it as a dynamic and inclusive process integral to the human experience.

Culture as a Way of Life

Williams’ declaration that "culture is ordinary" begins with a fundamental redefinition of culture itself. Traditional views often bifurcate culture into "high" and "low," where the former includes the fine arts, literature, and classical music, and the latter encompasses popular entertainment, folk practices, and everyday social rituals. Williams, however, rejects this dichotomy, arguing that culture is not merely the possession of a refined elite but the shared, lived experience of all people. He emphasizes that culture is both "a whole way of life" and "the arts and learning."

Culture encompasses the everyday practices and values that define the lived experiences of individuals and communities.

Williams’ perspective is grounded in the notion that culture is an active, dynamic process. It is not a static collection of artifacts or an exclusive set of practices but rather the sum of human experiences and the meanings that people ascribe to them. For example, the rituals surrounding communal meals, the stories told within families, and the social norms that guide interactions are all cultural expressions. These elements, though often overlooked by traditional cultural analysis, are central to understanding how societies function and evolve.

The significance of Williams’ argument lies in its inclusivity. By acknowledging that culture is ordinary, Williams democratizes cultural analysis, recognizing that every individual contributes to the cultural landscape. This perspective aligns with Antonio Gramsci’s concept of cultural hegemony, which highlights how dominant groups maintain power by shaping cultural norms and values. Williams’ inclusive view of culture challenges this dominance, asserting that the culture of everyday people is equally important and worthy of study.

The Role of Tradition and Change

Another critical aspect of Williams’ argument is the interplay between tradition and change within culture. He contends that culture is not only about preserving the past but also about adapting to and shaping the future. This dual nature of culture—rooted in tradition yet constantly evolving—underscores its complexity and vitality.

The relationship between tradition and change is central to understanding culture as an ordinary, dynamic process.

Williams uses the example of language to illustrate this point. Language, a fundamental cultural component, is both inherited and continuously transformed. It carries the weight of historical usage while adapting to new contexts and meanings. This fluidity is evident in the way slang, jargon, and new expressions emerge, reflecting changing social realities.

In his work, Williams often referenced the industrial working-class culture of his Welsh upbringing. This culture, characterized by its own traditions, practices, and values, illustrates how communities adapt to socio-economic changes while maintaining a sense of identity. The coal mining communities, for instance, developed a distinct cultural identity through shared labor, mutual support, and collective action. These cultural practices were not static but evolved in response to economic pressures and political movements, such as the labor strikes of the early 20th century.

The evolution of cultural practices within these communities exemplifies Williams' argument that culture is ordinary. It shows how everyday practices and collective memories contribute to a sense of identity and continuity, even as they adapt to new circumstances. This perspective is supported by anthropologist Clifford Geertz, who describes culture as "webs of significance" spun by individuals within a society, highlighting the ongoing process of meaning-making.

Cultural Production and Power

Williams' assertion also addresses the role of power in cultural production. By arguing that culture is ordinary, he challenges the hierarchical structures that privilege certain cultural forms over others. This critique extends to the institutions that disseminate and legitimize culture, such as museums, universities, and the media.

The democratization of culture involves challenging the power structures that privilege certain cultural forms and institutions.

Williams was critical of what he saw as the commercialization and commodification of culture. In his view, the culture industry often perpetuates a narrow, elitist view of culture, marginalizing the everyday cultural expressions of ordinary people. This critique aligns with the work of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, who argued that the culture industry manipulates mass society into passivity and conformity.

However, Williams offers a more optimistic view, emphasizing the potential for cultural resistance and agency. He highlights how popular culture, often dismissed as trivial or inferior, can be a site of resistance and creativity. For instance, the punk rock movement of the 1970s, with its DIY ethic and rebellious spirit, challenged mainstream cultural norms and offered a voice to marginalized youth. Similarly, contemporary hip-hop culture, originating in marginalized communities, has become a powerful medium for social commentary and resistance.

By recognizing the cultural significance of these movements, Williams' argument underscores the importance of valuing diverse cultural expressions. This perspective is further supported by cultural theorist Stuart Hall, who emphasizes the role of popular culture in articulating and negotiating identity and power.

Education and Cultural Transmission

Williams also addresses the role of education in cultural transmission. He argues that education should not be confined to the transmission of high culture but should encompass the broad spectrum of cultural experiences and knowledge.

Education plays a crucial role in transmitting and validating the diverse cultural practices that define everyday life.

Williams' view on education is that it should be a democratic process, accessible to all and reflective of diverse cultural backgrounds. This approach challenges traditional educational paradigms that often prioritize canonical texts and established cultural forms. Instead, Williams advocates for an education that acknowledges and values the cultural experiences of all students, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society.

This perspective is illustrated by the integration of multicultural education in contemporary curricula. By incorporating literature, history, and art from various cultural traditions, educators can provide a more comprehensive and inclusive view of culture. For example, including African American literature, indigenous history, and immigrant narratives in the curriculum not only enriches students' understanding of culture but also validates the experiences of diverse communities.

Moreover, Williams' emphasis on education as a means of cultural transmission aligns with Paulo Freire's concept of critical pedagogy. Freire argues that education should empower individuals to critically engage with their cultural and social contexts, fostering awareness and action. This approach resonates with Williams' view that culture is ordinary, as it emphasizes the importance of everyday experiences and the potential for cultural transformation through education.

The Ordinary and the Extraordinary

In discussing culture as ordinary, Williams does not dismiss the extraordinary achievements of art, literature, and science. Rather, he situates these achievements within the broader context of everyday cultural practices.

#### Topic Sentence: Recognizing culture as ordinary does not negate the value of extraordinary cultural achievements but contextualizes them within the broader fabric of everyday life.

Williams argues that the extraordinary is rooted in the ordinary, as great works of art and literature emerge from the lived experiences and cultural contexts of their creators. For example, Shakespeare's plays, often heralded as pinnacles of high culture, were deeply rooted in the social, political, and cultural milieu of Elizabethan England. Similarly, the works of Charles Dickens, though celebrated as literary classics, reflect the everyday realities and struggles of 19th-century Britain.

By situating extraordinary cultural achievements within their everyday contexts, Williams underscores the interconnectedness of all cultural forms. This perspective challenges the hierarchical valuation of culture and encourages a more holistic understanding of cultural production. It also highlights the potential for ordinary cultural practices to inspire and inform extraordinary achievements.

Conclusion

Raymond Williams' assertion that "culture is ordinary" represents a profound shift in cultural theory, emphasizing the inclusivity and dynamism of culture. By redefining culture as the lived experiences and practices of ordinary people, Williams democratizes cultural analysis and challenges traditional hierarchies. His perspective highlights the interplay between tradition and change, the role of power in cultural production, and the importance of education in cultural transmission.

Ultimately, Williams' view that culture is ordinary calls for a more equitable and comprehensive understanding of culture, one that values the diverse expressions and experiences of all people. This perspective not only enriches cultural theory but also has practical implications for education, social policy, and cultural production. By recognizing and valuing the ordinary, we can foster a more inclusive and dynamic cultural landscape, reflective of the richness and complexity of human experience.