Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: A learner asks for an extension for a written assignment. The learner states that he has just started chemotherapy for cancer and has not felt well and that three more days would really make a huge difference.

24 Nov 2022,2:51 PM

 

A learner asks for an extension for a written assignment. The learner states that he has just started chemotherapy for cancer and has not felt well and that three more days would really make a huge difference. You grant the extension. It is now two days past the extension deadline and no assignment has been submitted. You contact the learner who says that he has missed the extended deadline because of illness, and he asks if he could have just one more day. You grant this but identify there will be no more extensions. Another learner tells you that the first learner is lying—there is no cancer. What is your action?

Expert answer

 

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation. It is important to validate individual circumstances and follow a fair process when deciding whether or not to grant an extension. When another learner tells me that the first learner is lying about having cancer, I will investigate the matter further before making any decisions. I would reach out to both learners separately in order to gain a full understanding of their individual situations. If it is determined that the first learner has been untruthful, then disciplinary action may need to be taken. It is also important for me to not demonstrate favoritism towards either learner by treating them differently during this process. This will ensure fairness and transparency throughout the situation.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us