Question: Are inequalities harmful to the urban economy? Discuss the relationship between capital accumulation or financialisation and urbanisation.

13 Apr 2024,6:32 PM

 

1. Are inequalities harmful to the urban economy? Discuss the relationship between capital accumulation or financialisation and urbanisation. (unit1/2)

Core reading:

UN Habitat. Envisaging the Future of Cities. World Cities Report 2022. Nairobi: UN Habitat, 2022. pp. 31-69. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf

Yap, Christopher, Camila Cociña, and Caren Levy. ‘The Urban Dimensions of Inequality and Equality’. GOLD VI Working Paper Series #01 (November 2021). Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments. https://gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/gold_vi_working_paper_01.pdf Alvaredo, Facundo, Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman, eds. World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press, 2018. Executive Summary pp. 4-16. [Available online]. https://wir2018.wid.world/

Chancel, Lucas. “Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019.” Nature Sustainability 5, no. 11

(2022): 931-938. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-022-00955-z

 

2. Explain the impacts of globalisation on migration (internal and/or external) and/or agglomeration economies. (unit3/4)

Core reading:

Suwandi, Intan. “The Hidden Abode of Global Production.” In Value Chains: The New

Economic Imperialism, 13–41. NYU Press, 2019. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1f886k3.4. World Bank, 2009, "Scale economies and agglomeration", in World Development Report 2009, Chapter 4. Available at http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/ue1/WDR09_10_Ch04web.pdf

Selod, Harris, and Forhad Shilpi. "Rural-urban migration in developing countries: Lessons from the literature." Regional Science and Urban Economics 91 (2021): 103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103713

Kaufmann, David, Nora Räss, Dominique Strebel, and Fritz Sager. "Sanctuary cities in Europe? A policy survey of urban policies in support of irregular migrants." British Journal of Political Science 52, no. 4 (2022): 1954-1963.

Manfredi-Sánchez,  Juan  Luis.  "Sanctuary  cities:  what  global  migration  means  for  local

governments." Social Sciences 9, no. 8 (2020): 146.

 

Requirements:

-A contemporary case study (preferably a city or a country, justifying the choice between the two);

-Definitions and case studies of key concepts used both discussed in class and from your own research.

-Data and literature relevant to your framework of analysis.

 

DRAFT / STUDY TIPS:

To critically discuss the question of whether inequalities are harmful to the urban economy and to explore the relationship between capital accumulation/financialization and urbanization, we must delve into several interconnected aspects of urban development, economic theory, and societal impacts.

Inequality and the Urban Economy

Inequalities within urban economies have profound effects on economic performance, social stability, and overall well-being. Urban areas are often characterized by significant disparities in income, wealth distribution, access to services, and opportunities. These inequalities manifest in spatial segregation, inadequate public infrastructure in certain neighborhoods, differential access to education and healthcare, and varying levels of social mobility.

1. Economic Growth and Inequality: Inequality can hinder economic growth. When a large segment of the urban population lacks adequate education, healthcare, or access to resources, their potential productivity and contribution to the economy are diminished. Unequal distribution of income and wealth can lead to reduced consumer spending among lower-income groups, impacting local businesses and markets.

2. Social Cohesion and Stability: High levels of inequality often correlate with increased social tensions and crime rates within urban areas. Unequal access to resources and opportunities can breed resentment and dissatisfaction, potentially leading to social unrest or political instability, which can disrupt economic activities.

3. Human Capital Development: Inequality affects human capital development. Unequal access to education and healthcare limits the potential talent pool available to urban businesses. This can constrain innovation and technological advancement, which are crucial drivers of economic growth in modern urban economies.

Examples: A classic example is the case of inner-city neighborhoods with substandard schools and limited job opportunities compared to affluent suburbs with excellent educational resources and employment prospects. This disparity perpetuates a cycle of poverty and limits upward mobility for residents.

Capital Accumulation, Financialization, and Urbanization

The relationship between capital accumulation, financialization, and urbanization is complex and has evolved significantly over time. Urbanization refers to the growth and expansion of cities, both in terms of population and physical infrastructure. Capital accumulation involves the concentration of wealth and resources in the hands of a few, often through mechanisms such as investment, profit extraction, and property ownership. Financialization refers to the increasing dominance of financial markets and financial motives in the operation of the economy.

1. Real Estate and Property Markets: Urbanization often drives demand for real estate and property development. As cities grow, there is increased pressure on land and housing markets, leading to speculative investments and property price inflation. This can exacerbate inequalities by pricing out low-income residents and contributing to gentrification.

2. Financial Markets and Urban Investment: Financialization incentivizes short-term profit-seeking behavior. Urban development projects may prioritize returns for investors over broader social or environmental considerations. This can lead to the neglect of affordable housing initiatives, public infrastructure, and other social services critical for equitable urban development.

3. Infrastructure and Public Services: The financing of urban infrastructure (e.g., transportation networks, utilities, public spaces) has increasingly relied on private capital and financial instruments like municipal bonds. While this can accelerate development, it may also result in privatization and unequal access to essential services based on ability to pay.

Examples: The expansion of global financial centers like London and New York has been accompanied by soaring property values, displacing long-standing communities and contributing to social fragmentation. Similarly, the rise of private equity investments in urban infrastructure projects can sometimes prioritize profit margins over public interest.

Conclusion

In summary, inequalities pose significant challenges to the health and sustainability of urban economies. They impede economic growth, undermine social cohesion, and perpetuate cycles of poverty and exclusion. The relationship between capital accumulation/financialization and urbanization can further exacerbate these inequalities by prioritizing profit-driven development at the expense of broader societal needs. Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach that integrates economic policies, urban planning strategies, and social interventions to promote inclusive and sustainable urban development.

 

 

DRAFT / STUDY TIPS 2:

To critically discuss the impacts of globalization on migration and agglomeration economies, we need to explore how these processes interact and evolve within the context of global economic integration. Globalization, characterized by increased interconnectedness and interdependence among economies, has profound effects on the movement of people and the spatial organization of economic activities. This discussion will delve into both internal and external migration patterns, as well as the dynamics of agglomeration economies, to understand the multifaceted impacts of globalization.

Globalization and Migration

Internal Migration

Internal migration refers to the movement of people within a country from one region to another. Globalization has significantly influenced patterns of internal migration through several mechanisms:

1. Industrialization and Urbanization: The globalization of production and trade has led to rapid industrialization and urbanization in many developing countries. This has created employment opportunities in urban centers, attracting migrants from rural areas seeking better livelihoods. For instance, the rapid growth of manufacturing hubs like Shenzhen in China or Bangalore in India has drawn millions of internal migrants.

2. Regional Disparities: Globalization can exacerbate regional economic disparities within countries, leading to migration flows towards more economically dynamic regions. For example, in the United States, the Rust Belt experienced significant outmigration due to industrial decline, while Sun Belt cities attracted migrants with growing service and technology sectors.

3. Infrastructure Development: Globalization often spurs investments in infrastructure, connecting previously isolated regions and facilitating migration. Improved transportation networks can make internal migration easier and more attractive.

External Migration

External migration, or international migration, involves movement across national borders. Globalization has transformed external migration in several ways:

1. Labor Mobility: Globalization has expanded international labor markets, allowing workers to seek employment opportunities abroad. For instance, skilled professionals from India and the Philippines migrate to the United States, Europe, and Gulf countries for better job prospects.

2. Global Supply Chains: The integration of global supply chains has created demand for specific types of labor in different countries. Migration is often driven by labor needs in sectors like agriculture, construction, and hospitality.

3. Remittances: Globalization has increased the flow of remittances—money sent back home by migrants—to developing countries. Remittances play a crucial role in poverty alleviation and economic development in many regions.

Agglomeration Economies

Agglomeration economies refer to the benefits that firms and industries derive from being located close to one another. Globalization influences agglomeration economies through the spatial concentration of economic activities:

1. Urbanization and Clustering: Globalization fosters the concentration of industries and services in specific urban areas, leading to the formation of specialized clusters. For instance, Silicon Valley in the United States and Zhongguancun in China are renowned for their high-tech clusters.

2. Knowledge Spillovers: Proximity facilitates the exchange of knowledge and information among firms, leading to innovation and productivity gains. Globalization accelerates these knowledge spillovers by connecting firms across borders.

3. Infrastructure and Amenities: Global cities attract investment in infrastructure and amenities, creating favorable conditions for businesses to thrive. The presence of world-class universities, research institutions, and cultural facilities enhances agglomeration effects.

Critically Assessing Impacts

The impacts of globalization on migration and agglomeration economies are not without challenges and complexities:

1. Income Inequality: While globalization can create economic opportunities in urban centers, it can also widen income disparities between regions and communities. This can lead to social tensions and urban sprawl.

2. Brain Drain: External migration of skilled professionals from developing countries to developed countries can exacerbate skill shortages in the origin countries, hindering local development.

3. Environmental Impact: Concentration of economic activities in specific regions can strain local resources and contribute to environmental degradation.

4. Policy Responses: Globalization requires effective policy responses to manage migration flows and leverage agglomeration economies for inclusive and sustainable development.

 

Examples

• European Union: The European Union exemplifies internal migration driven by economic integration. Workers from Eastern European countries migrate to Western European countries in search of better job opportunities, creating both benefits (labor market flexibility) and challenges (social integration).

• China's Special Economic Zones (SEZs): China's SEZs, such as Shenzhen and Shanghai, illustrate how globalization influences internal migration and agglomeration economies. These zones attracted massive inflows of migrants and foreign investments, contributing to China's rapid economic growth.

In conclusion, globalization profoundly impacts migration patterns (internal and external) and agglomeration economies by reshaping spatial dynamics of economic activities. While globalization offers new opportunities for economic development and innovation, it also poses challenges related to inequality, brain drain, and environmental sustainability. Effective policies that balance economic integration with social inclusion are essential to harness the benefits of globalization while mitigating its adverse effects on migration and urban development.

 

 

https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2024/04/13/9667-rCk_18_32_32_instructions.pdf