Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Chiesa (1994) and Schneider & Morris (1987) give a historical account of radical behaviorism and its relationship to psychology. Provide a brief rationale as to why Radical Behaviorism should not be considered a subdiscipline of psychology or a science in its own right.

12 Oct 2022,9:18 PM

 

Chiesa (1994) and Schneider & Morris (1987) give a historical account of radical behaviorism and its relationship to psychology. Provide a brief rationale as to why Radical Behaviorism should not be considered a subdiscipline of psychology or a science in its own right.

Expert answer

 

Radical behaviorism is a school of thought that emerged from behaviorism, which itself is a subdiscipline of psychology. While behaviorism focuses on the study of observable behaviors, radical behaviorism takes a more holistic approach that also considers the underlying psychological and biological processes that drive those behaviors.

 

Radical behaviorism has been criticized for its lack of scientific rigor and for its refusal to consider internal mental states as part of its purview. This has led some to argue that radical behaviorism is not a science in its own right, but rather a philosophy or set of principles that guide research within the field of psychology. Others have argued that radical behaviorism is a valuable perspective that can contribute to our understanding of human behavior.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us