Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Explain how the “the desire to win” can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped? Provide an example to strengthen your argument

27 Oct 2022,1:14 AM

 

The United States judicial systems are based on the Constitution of the United States guaranteeing due process of the law. All court officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, public defenders, and judges are bound to an oath of office and the code of ethics to obey to the law. Everybody is equal in front of the law. Is this statement still valid? Create a critical analysis based on the following statements: The prosecutor evaluates the evidence and facts of a case and decides to prosecute or to nolle prosequi the criminal cases. Explain how the “the desire to win” can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped? Provide an example to strengthen your argument. Most minority offenders are indigent and can’t afford a private defense attorney. Therefore, the court will assign a public defender to represent the defendant. The public defender maintains a heavy workload with minimum budgets. Does​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​ the public defender behave ethically when he or she is pushing plea bargains in most cases or is plea bargaining a violation of a defendant’s rights to due process? In the prisons and jails, minorities represent most of the population. Determine if sentencing decisions discriminate against certain groups. Determine if more whites are sentenced to probation versus minorities, even when they commit the same crime. Support your answer with statistical information. Indicate if those sentences are unethical, and then determine what can be done to minimize discrimination. Most of the sentences are retributive, resulting in incarceration. Consider the three ethical frameworks for punishment: 1) utilitarianism, 2) deontology, and 3) peacemaking. Which framework should serve as the ethical framework for punishment today? Support your decision with an example. Length: 6-8 pages References: Include a minimum of five scholarly r​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​esources.

Expert answer

 

The "desire to win" can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped for several reasons. First, the prosecutor may feel pressure to secure a conviction in order to maintain a high success rate. Second, the prosecutor may believe that the defendant is guilty and want to see justice served. Finally, the prosecutor may be seeking personal glory or recognition from his or her peers.

 

One example of how the "desire to win" can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped is the case of Michael Morton. In 1986, Mr. Morton was wrongfully convicted of murdering his wife based on faulty evidence and prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutor in this case, Ken Anderson, withheld key evidence that could have exonerated Mr. Morton and instead presented false evidence to the jury. As a result of Mr. Morton's wrongful conviction, he spent nearly 25 years in prison before being exonerated. Had prosecutor Anderson not been so focused on winning the case, Mr. Morton would have never spent a day in jail for a crime he did not commit.

 

This example shows how the "desire to win" can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped. In this instance, the prosecutor withheld key evidence and presented false evidence in order to secure a conviction. This led to an innocent man spending nearly 25 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. The "desire to win" can therefore have serious consequences and should not be the sole motivation for a prosecutor when pursuing a case.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us