a case study
Nutract is a relative newcomer to the agricultural machinery market, established in 1983. Despite this, they have managed to establish their product in a market otherwise dominated by companies such as John Deere, CNH Industrial and Kubota.
Through subsidy of training centres (for example, donating machinery to agricultural colleges) and a system of scholarships, Nutract ensured that there were a lot of people in farming communities who were familiar with their equipment. This strategy has allowed them to carve out a niche in the marketplace because independent dealerships find it easiest to hire technicians who have been trained on Nutract systems.
Nutract describe their current product, NT3050, as a “multipurpose agricultural vehicle platform.” It’s a powerful, all-wheel drive tractor that can be used with a variety of accessories to perform a wide range of tasks on medium and large farms, including tilling the soil, planting, spraying, transporting bales, and light construction work.
Nutract is a global concern, with components manufactured in many different places. Global sourcing has made Nutract vehicles highly competitive, with parts and finished vehicles typically moving by sea. Table 1 shows the main sources, covering over 95% of the total cost of a vehicle. Final assembly takes place in the USA, in Poland and in South Africa. South America and Asia are areas currently showing particularly strong growth, although other regions of the globe are by no means struggling: there is a lot of demand for Nutract’s innovative NT3050 vehicle.
| Element | Primary source | Secondary source | Tertiary source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large castings | India | Mexico | Hungary |
| Vehicle body panels* | USA | Poland | South Africa |
| Types and seals | Malaysia | USA | |
| Hydraulic systems | Germany | People’s Republic of China | |
| Electrical system | Mexico | South Korea | |
| Interior and controls | France | USA | Japan |
| Diesel engine | USA | UK | People’s Republic of China |
| Fuel system | Italy | Japan | |
| Final assembly* | USA | Poland | South Africa |
Table 1: Location of major manufacturing operations in the Nutract supply network
( denotes a wholly-owned Nutract site)*
Last year was a good one for Nutract, in fact the best in the company’s history. It was the first full year during which the NT3050 was available and if anything Nutract struggled to keep pace with demand. “A nice problem to have,” was how they described it at the time, vowing that this year would see the elimination of bottlenecks in the supply network.
Unfortunately, thoughts of expanding the company’s operations must now be put on hold, at least for a while. In the northern hemisphere, growers are now entering a time of peak activity and there have been a flurry of breakdowns. NT3050 incorporates a sophisticated module, the Ground Pressure Sensor, that is important for the efficient operation of the vehicle – and vital for operator safety since it reduces the danger of the machine rolling over on uneven ground.
Almost four thousand NT3050s are reporting faults with this module. (Like most advanced farm vehicles, NT3050 has a condition monitoring system that tells its owner and the manufacturer of any such problems.) The fault has put them in a ‘limited functionality’ mode that reduces the power and efficiency of the vehicle until a new Ground Pressure Sensor can be fitted. A further 900 NT3050s are reported to have put themselves in ‘emergency shutdown’ and won’t move at all until a new Ground Pressure Sensor can be fitted. In all cases, the NT3050 is still under warranty.
https://youtu.be/YClRzSBeIIQ
Nutract engineers have subjected a number of failed Ground Pressure Sensors to testing. It appears that this is not a quality problem from the supply chain, but a design fault: the supplier made the item exactly as specified but the module is not durable enough. Nutract will need to fit every NT3050 with a redesigned Ground Pressure Sensor, but when this was discussed at an emergency staff meeting, the following problems were identified:
Nutract don’t have a large enough staff of technicians to replace the Ground Pressure Sensor on every failed NT3050 in a timely manner.
More NT3050s are reporting faults daily, and this is likely to continue.
The current inventory is not adequate to permit replacement of all Ground Pressure Sensors, and in any case all such items have the same design fault and can be expected to fail in the future.
Owners need their NT3050s to be serviceable as soon as possible, or vital planting time will be lost. Any delay also does considerable harm to the reputation of Nutract.
Nutract must now devise a strategy to minimise the impact of the problems described, reacting not as a single company but as a part of an integrated supply network, applying the principles of logistics and supply chain management.
—
Note: Nutract is fictional, but the industry is a real one. Thus, you might support your report with evidence drawn from real-world sources such as market reports, scholarly articles, news media and other information found by researching the agricultural machinery industry. You may wish to draw upon lessons from other industries, e.g. product recalls and fixes seen elsewhere such as in the automotive or electronics sectors. You will also need to apply theory of the kind introduced during the module and in the recommended textbooks, perhaps discussing themes such as capacity and supply chain resilience. Where you are able to reflect background reading (in these and other areas) within your coursework, the result will be a more persuasive document.
How Can Nutract Overcome Its Supply Chain Challenges to Ensure Sustainable Growth in the Agricultural Machinery Industry?
The agricultural machinery industry is a cornerstone of global food production, with major players like John Deere, CNH Industrial, and Kubota dominating the market. Nutract, a relatively new entrant established in 1983, has managed to carve out a niche by focusing on training and education within farming communities. However, the company now faces a significant challenge with its flagship product, the NT3050, due to a design flaw in the Ground Pressure Sensor module. This report critically evaluates Nutract’s current supply chain and operational strategies, identifies key issues, and provides actionable recommendations to mitigate the impact of the current crisis. The report employs tools such as PESTLE analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, and the Kraljic Portfolio to analyze the situation, supported by real-world data and academic literature. The goal is to ensure Nutract can overcome its current challenges and achieve sustainable growth in a highly competitive industry.
A PESTLE analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the external factors affecting Nutract’s operations.
Political: Government policies on agriculture, such as subsidies and tariffs, significantly impact the demand for agricultural machinery. For instance, the U.S. Farm Bill and the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) influence farmers’ purchasing decisions (USDA, 2021). Nutract must navigate these policies to maintain its market position.
Economic: The global agricultural machinery market was valued at $155.3 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.5% from 2022 to 2030 (Allied Market Research, 2022). However, economic downturns and fluctuating commodity prices can affect farmers’ ability to invest in new machinery.
Social: The increasing adoption of precision agriculture and sustainable farming practices is driving demand for advanced machinery. Nutract’s focus on training and education aligns well with this trend, but the current product recall could damage its reputation.
Technological: The integration of IoT and AI in agricultural machinery is transforming the industry. Nutract’s NT3050, with its condition monitoring system, is a step in the right direction, but the design flaw in the Ground Pressure Sensor highlights the need for robust R&D.
Legal: Compliance with international standards and regulations, such as ISO 9001 for quality management, is crucial. The current recall could lead to legal challenges if not handled properly.
Environmental: Sustainability is a growing concern in agriculture. Nutract must ensure its products are environmentally friendly and comply with regulations such as the EU’s Machinery Directive.
Porter’s Five Forces framework helps analyze the competitive dynamics of the agricultural machinery industry.
Threat of New Entrants: The high capital requirements and established brand loyalty make it difficult for new entrants to compete. However, Nutract’s innovative approach and focus on training have allowed it to carve out a niche.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Nutract’s global sourcing strategy reduces dependency on any single supplier. However, the design flaw in the Ground Pressure Sensor indicates a need for better supplier collaboration and quality control.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: Farmers have significant bargaining power due to the availability of alternatives. Nutract’s focus on customer education and after-sales service can help mitigate this.
Threat of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes is low, as agricultural machinery is essential for large-scale farming. However, the availability of used machinery and rental options can impact sales.
Industry Rivalry: The industry is highly competitive, with major players like John Deere and CNH Industrial dominating the market. Nutract must differentiate itself through innovation and customer service.
The Kraljic Portfolio matrix helps categorize Nutract’s supply chain components based on their impact on profitability and supply risk.
Strategic Items: The Ground Pressure Sensor is a strategic item due to its critical role in the NT3050’s functionality. The current design flaw highlights the need for better supplier collaboration and R&D investment.
Leverage Items: Components like hydraulic systems and diesel engines are leverage items, as they are sourced from multiple suppliers. Nutract should negotiate better terms with these suppliers to reduce costs.
Bottleneck Items: Certain specialized components, such as the electrical system, may be bottleneck items. Nutract should consider dual sourcing or vertical integration to mitigate supply risks.
Non-Critical Items: Standardized components like tires and seals are non-critical items. Nutract can use competitive bidding to reduce costs.
Nutract’s global sourcing strategy, with components manufactured in India, Mexico, Germany, and other countries, provides cost advantages but also introduces complexities. The final assembly in the USA, Poland, and South Africa allows Nutract to serve key markets efficiently. However, the current recall highlights the need for better coordination and quality control across the supply chain.
The NT3050’s success has led to capacity constraints, particularly in the final assembly plants. The recall of nearly 4,000 units due to the Ground Pressure Sensor flaw has exacerbated these bottlenecks. Nutract must invest in capacity expansion and process optimization to meet future demand.
Nutract relies on sea transport for moving components and finished vehicles, which is cost-effective but slow. The current recall has highlighted the need for faster logistics solutions, such as air freight for critical components.
Nutract’s condition monitoring system is a valuable tool for identifying issues like the Ground Pressure Sensor flaw. However, the company must improve its data analytics capabilities to predict and prevent such issues in the future.
Nutract’s focus on training and education has been a key differentiator. However, the current recall has exposed a shortage of skilled technicians. The company must invest in training programs to build a larger pool of qualified technicians.
Immediate Recall and Repair: Nutract should prioritize the recall and repair of affected NT3050 units. The company can partner with local dealerships and third-party service providers to expedite the process.
Temporary Capacity Expansion: Nutract should consider temporary measures, such as overtime and additional shifts, to increase production capacity and meet demand.
Enhanced Communication: Nutract must communicate transparently with customers about the recall and repair process to maintain trust and minimize reputational damage.
Supplier Collaboration: Nutract should work closely with its suppliers to redesign the Ground Pressure Sensor and ensure its durability. The company can also explore dual sourcing to reduce dependency on a single supplier.
Capacity Expansion: Nutract should invest in expanding its final assembly plants to meet growing demand. The company can also explore new assembly locations in emerging markets like South America and Asia.
Logistics Optimization: Nutract should optimize its logistics network by investing in faster transportation solutions, such as air freight for critical components.
R&D Investment: Nutract must invest in R&D to improve product design and prevent future issues. The company can also explore new technologies, such as IoT and AI, to enhance product functionality.
Skills Development: Nutract should expand its training programs to build a larger pool of skilled technicians. The company can also collaborate with agricultural colleges to develop specialized courses.
Sustainability Initiatives: Nutract should focus on sustainability by developing environmentally friendly products and processes. The company can also explore renewable energy options for its manufacturing plants.
Nutract’s current challenges highlight the importance of a robust and resilient supply chain. By addressing the immediate issues with the NT3050 and implementing long-term strategies, Nutract can overcome its current crisis and achieve sustainable growth. The recommendations provided in this report, supported by industry data and academic literature, offer a roadmap for Nutract to navigate the complexities of the agricultural machinery industry and emerge stronger.
Copyright © 2012 - 2025 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.