Reconstruction of domestic activities and social relations within households by historical archaeologists
Household and Workplace; How have historical archaeologists combined different sources of evidence to reconstruct domestic activities and social relations within households? Use two different sites or groups of sites as case studies in your answer, and critically consider how different sources of evidence (buildings, artefacts, documents) are used to reconstruct historic households. Consider how well historical archaeologists have been able to use material evidence to investigate the internal relationships within households. Use New World British Colonial (Jamestown and Williamsburg) and New World Spanish Colonial (St. Augustine and Ft. San Juan) sites as major examples. Use only sites on the eastern US and Caribbean as examples. refer to the following archaeologists/authors at a minimum: Kathleen Deagan, Jose Maria Cruxent, Barbara L. Voss, Nesta Anderson, John E. Worth, Paula A. Shackel, Barbara J Little, Robin A. Beck, Christopher B. Rodning, and David G. Moore.
Historical archaeologists have long been interested in understanding how people lived in the past. In particular, they have sought to reconstruct domestic activities and social relations within households. To do this, they have drawn on a variety of sources of evidence, including material culture, architectural remains, and written documents.
One of the most important sources of evidence for understanding domestic life in the past is material culture. This includes both the objects that people used in their everyday lives, and the rubbish that they discarded. By studying the way that different objects were used, and the patterns of their distribution within households, archaeologists can gain insights into domestic activities such as cooking, child-rearing, and care of the elderly.
Another important source of evidence for understanding domestic life is architectural remains.
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.