In Chapter 1 of Theory and Reality, Peter Godfrey-Smith discusses three possible ideas of how science works: through empiricism, by using mathematical tools, or through its unique social structure. Explain each of these three ideas. Does one of them or some combination of them seem especially compelling for explaining how science works, and what makes it unique and/ or especially successful? Do any of them seem less compelling? Why?
Some people think that science works best when it is based on what we can observe and learn from the world around us. This is often called the empirical approach. Others think that math is the key to understanding how science works. This is because math can help us to see patterns and relationships that we might not be able to see just by looking at the world around us. Finally, some people think that science works best when it has a special social structure. This means that scientists work together in groups and share their ideas with each other. This can help to make sure that scientists are always learning from each other and making progress in their work.
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.