Change is inevitable in any organization, and the approach to change management plays a crucial role in the success of the organization. There are two main approaches to change management: planned and emergent approaches. The planned approach is a top-down approach that emphasizes a clear and well-defined plan for change, while the emergent approach is a bottom-up approach that emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances.
Change is inevitable in any organization, and the approach to change management plays a crucial role in the success of the organization. There are two main approaches to change management: planned and emergent approaches. The planned approach is a top-down approach that emphasizes a clear and well-defined plan for change, while the emergent approach is a bottom-up approach that emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances. This paper seeks to critically discuss the relationship between the two approaches, with relevant examples where applicable.
Planned approach to change
The planned approach to change is a traditional approach that emphasizes a well-defined and structured plan for change. This approach is typically associated with top-down management and is characterized by a focus on predictability, control, and stability. In this approach, change is initiated by senior management and is typically driven by a clear set of objectives, a detailed project plan, and a predetermined timeline.
The planned approach is most appropriate when the organization is facing a well-defined problem and the solution is known. For instance, if an organization is facing a decline in sales, it may decide to implement a new sales strategy that has been tested and proven successful in other organizations. In such cases, the planned approach is suitable because the problem is clear, and the solution is known.
However, the planned approach has its limitations. For instance, it assumes that change is a linear process that can be predicted and controlled. This assumption is often not true in the real world, where change is often unpredictable, and outcomes are uncertain. In addition, the planned approach assumes that the organization can implement change in a controlled and organized manner without considering the impact of human factors such as resistance to change and employee engagement.
Emergent approach to change
The emergent approach to change is a more flexible and adaptive approach that emphasizes the importance of being responsive to changing circumstances. This approach is typically associated with bottom-up management and is characterized by a focus on experimentation, learning, and continuous improvement. In this approach, change is initiated by employees, and the organization's management is responsible for creating an environment that encourages experimentation and learning.
The emergent approach is most appropriate when the organization is facing a complex and uncertain problem, and the solution is unknown. For instance, if an organization is facing a decline in market share due to changes in consumer preferences, it may decide to implement a more exploratory approach that involves testing new products and services to see what works. In such cases, the emergent approach is suitable because it allows the organization to experiment and learn from its mistakes.
However, the emergent approach also has its limitations. For instance, it assumes that employees have the necessary knowledge and skills to initiate and implement change effectively. This assumption is often not true in the real world, where employees may lack the necessary skills and resources to implement change effectively. In addition, the emergent approach assumes that change can be initiated and implemented without a clear set of objectives, a detailed project plan, and a predetermined timeline.
Relationship between planned and emergent approaches to change
The relationship between planned and emergent approaches to change is often seen as a dichotomy, with the two approaches seen as mutually exclusive. However, in reality, the two approaches are complementary, and there is often a symbiotic relationship between them.
The planned approach provides a structure and a framework for change, while the emergent approach provides the flexibility and adaptability to respond to changing circumstances. For instance, an organization may use a planned approach to define its strategic direction and goals, and an emergent approach to implement those goals in a flexible and adaptive manner.
In addition, the two approaches can be used together in a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both approaches. For instance, an organization may use a planned approach to define its overall strategic direction and goals, and an emergent approach to implement those goals in a flexible and adaptive manner. This approach can provide the organization with a clear direction while also allowing it to respond to changing circumstances and take advantage of new opportunities.
However, there are challenges to using a hybrid approach to change management. One challenge is that the planned and emergent approaches require different skill sets and mindsets. The planned approach requires a more structured and analytical approach, while the emergent approach requires a more exploratory and innovative approach. It can be challenging to find individuals who possess both sets of skills and can operate effectively in a hybrid approach.
Another challenge is that the planned and emergent approaches require different levels of control and autonomy. The planned approach requires a high level of control to ensure that the change is implemented according to plan, while the emergent approach requires a high level of autonomy to allow for experimentation and innovation. It can be challenging to find the right balance between control and autonomy in a hybrid approach.
Examples of planned and emergent approaches to change
To illustrate the relationship between planned and emergent approaches to change, it is useful to examine some examples of organizations that have used these approaches.
One example of an organization that has used a planned approach to change is IBM. In the early 1990s, IBM was facing significant financial losses and a decline in market share. The company's senior management initiated a planned approach to change, which involved a significant restructuring of the company's operations, including layoffs and divestitures.
The planned approach was successful in restoring IBM's financial performance and positioning the company for long-term growth. However, the approach also had negative consequences, including a loss of employee morale and a negative impact on the company's reputation.
Another example of an organization that has used an emergent approach to change is Google. Google is known for its innovative culture and its ability to respond quickly to changing circumstances. The company encourages its employees to experiment and take risks, and it has a culture that values learning and continuous improvement.
This emergent approach has been successful in allowing Google to develop new products and services quickly and to respond to changing market conditions. However, it also has some negative consequences, including a lack of structure and direction that can lead to confusion and inefficiency.
A third example of an organization that has used a hybrid approach to change is Procter & Gamble (P&G). P&G has a history of using a planned approach to change, but in recent years, the company has shifted toward a more emergent approach.
P&G has established innovation centers around the world, where employees can experiment and develop new products and services. At the same time, the company's senior management has defined a clear strategic direction and goals for the company, providing a framework for the emergent approach.
This hybrid approach has been successful in allowing P&G to develop new products and services quickly while also maintaining a clear strategic direction. However, it also requires a significant investment in resources to create and maintain the innovation centers and to provide the necessary support and resources to employees.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the relationship between planned and emergent approaches to change is complex and multifaceted. While the two approaches are often seen as mutually exclusive, they are complementary and can be used together in a hybrid approach. The planned approach provides a structure and a framework for change, while the emergent approach provides the flexibility and adaptability to respond to changing circumstances. Organizations that are able to find the right balance between these two approaches can be successful in achieving their strategic goals while also being responsive to changing market conditions.
Customer ID: 100351