Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: Nietzsche turned all things upside down when he introduces “master morality” and “slave morality” in his On the Genealogy of Morals. How do you assess Nietzsche’s position on evil, or what society considers evil?

27 Oct 2022,8:09 AM

 

Nietzsche turned all things upside down when he introduces “master morality” and “slave morality” in his On the Genealogy of Morals. How do you assess Nietzsche’s position on evil, or what society considers evil? How would Kierkegaard respond to Nietzsche’s individualism, the great individuals Nietzsche often talks about (who would fit exemplify his “master morality”)?

Expert answer

 

Nietzsche's notions of "master morality" and "slave morality" present a radical reevaluation of our traditional understanding of good and evil. In master morality, what is good is whatever benefits the strong and powerful, while evil is anything that hinders their success. This way of thinking stands in stark contrast to slave morality, which holds that the weak and powerless are good, while those who oppress them are evil. Kierkegaard would likely respond to Nietzsche's individualism by pointing out that it leads to a dangerous atomization of society. Without a shared sense of community, individuals will only be concerned with their own self-interests. This will ultimately lead to a breakdown of social cohesion and an increase in conflict.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us