Human Capital, defined as the skills, knowledge, and abilities that an individual possesses, has been a focal point of economic research in labor, development, and political economy—to name a few. Education and job training are important human capital investments, leading to higher earnings and non-pecuniary benefits. Your ECON 4400 project focuses on the former. You will quantify the returns to human capital, estimating the effect of a year of schooling on an individual’s wage. While economics has developed sound theoret- ical foundations, empirical work on the return to human capital has been at the center of considerable debate.
As part of your project, you will explore a part of that debate by replicating (approximately, I have simplified the analysis to a degree) the results of Angrist and Krueger (1990) using the 2021 American Community Survey (ACS). I chose this approach to foster critical thinking and deepen econometric knowledge. Our analysis will also draw upon Bound, Jaeger, and Baker’s (1995) critique of the instrumental variables ap- proach used in Angrist and Kreuger (1990).
Throughout the term, you will complete parts of the analysis and submit each component as a homework assignment. In doing so, I can assist with your learning of econometrics in practice. Additionally, the home- work assignments enable me to address issues with coding or analysis.
For each assignment, you need only to submit what is requested. You will include the tables created for each assignment with your term project. A homework assignment will also ask you to introduce, discuss, and explain particular sections of your term project, e.g., data, regression analysis, results, and econometric methodologies. After I return the assignment, you should edit and expand the section following the outline below, addressing any notes or needed corrections.
You will analyze the returns to education and labor force participation at the state level. Refer to Table 1 to see your assigned state. To download your data file, log on to Carmen, go to Modules, scroll toward the bottom of the page, and download the state data file assigned to you.
You will write a three to four page analysis (not including tables and can be longer if needed) of the returns to education (and of labor force participation) and submit it at the beginning of class on Tuesday, 12/05. The paper will include three tables: a table of summary statistics, labor force participation estimates, and returns to education estimates (see Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 ). You need to attach your do-file with the paper. If you do not submit a working do-file, you will receive, at most, half credit for this assessment.
Your do-file needs to be cleaned of any redundant or incorrect commands. The entire do-file needs to be executable. In other words, if you click the execute icon, Stata executes every command without error.
Your write-up of the analysis should follow the below general outline–the sub-items do not need to follow the stated order. At a minimum, you must address each enumerated item. Your writing needs to flow (does not read as an itemized list). Each paragraph must consist of one key idea and includes supportive statements (evidence, results, etc.) of that key idea. Additionally, you need to ensure your writing includes transitions between key ideas (paragraphs).
You can access the papers on Carmen Modules, Articles for Term Project–bottom of the Modules page
References and Citations - Chicago Style If you choose to support an argument by drawing on the work of other scholars, you need to follow the below citation and reference style (Chicago). When you cite an article or research paper, you must include a reference section with your paper.
Citation and reference examples:
In-text citation Reference list
Author Year First author’s last name, first author’s first name, second author’s first and last names, third author’s first and last name, . . . , and last author’s first and last name. Year of publications. “Title of article.” Title of Journal, volume number(issue/number, or date/month of publication if volume and issue are absent): page numbers (if any).
Example - Parenthetical
(Tesseur 2022) Tesseur, W. 2022. “Translation as inclusion? An analysis of international
NGOs’ translation policy documents.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 45(3): 261–283.
Example - Narrative
Piketty and Saez (2003) Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. 2003. “Income Inequality in the
United States, 1913–1998.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1):
1–41.
You will generate one do-file for this project. Each assignment will have you add to your code document (do-file). You must save your do-file at each step of the project (I recommend saving it regularly when working on an assignment). Separate each part using asterisks. For example:
********************
**ECON 4400 Project: Name - Assigned State
********************
********************
**Homework 1 - Summary Statistics
...code here...
********************
********************
**Homework 2 - Labor Force Participation
...code here...
********************
********************
**Homework 3 - OLS Returns to Education
...code here...
********************
********************
**Homework 4 - 2SLS Returns to Education
...code here...
********************
Table 1: Data Assignments for Term Project (and Homework Assignments)
Name |
State FIP |
State |
Azimi, Hassina |
20 |
Kansas |
Backlin, Will |
6 |
California |
Bian, Shuo |
16 |
Idaho |
Bodnar, Andrew |
9 |
Connecticut |
Brady, Alex |
12 |
Florida |
Carroll, Jack |
4 |
Arizona |
Cavanagh, Devin |
15 |
Hawaii |
Cervantes Lopez, Diego |
39 |
Ohio |
Chu, Shirley |
55 |
Wisconsin |
Cowan, Ben |
25 |
Massachusetts |
Dallin, Abdul |
12 |
Florida |
DeMarco, Jill |
25 |
Massachusetts |
Deng, Peter |
31 |
Nebraska |
Doumet, Daniel |
27 |
Minnesota |
Dudek, Alli |
19 |
Iowa |
Dunlap, Joe |
51 |
Virginia |
Earls, Claire |
24 |
Maryland |
Ellis, Sydney |
27 |
Minnesota |
Fang, Junjie |
24 |
Maryland |
Gardner, Luke |
44 |
Rhode Island |
To be Continued
Name |
State FIP |
State |
Greenwalt, Jack |
26 |
Michigan |
Guo, Geyang |
51 |
Virginia |
Guzzo, Patrick |
36 |
New York |
Halkatti, Anirudh |
4 |
Arizona |
Healy, Caroline |
44 |
Rhode Island |
Hernandez, Angelina |
42 |
Pennsylvania |
Huang, Longji |
9 |
Connecticut |
Knapp, Jenna |
17 |
Illinois |
Koontz, Kyle |
13 |
Georgia |
Kramer, David |
5 |
Arkansas |
Kratt, Peter |
45 |
South Carolina |
Lang, Lionel |
31 |
Nebraska |
Liu, Chunlin |
45 |
South Carolina |
Maxamod, Caisha |
39 |
Ohio |
McNary, Ross |
9 |
Connecticut |
Meng, Kevin |
19 |
Iowa |
Miranda, Jack |
36 |
New York |
Morris, Dejanique |
25 |
Massachusetts |
Nakanishi, Sanenao |
15 |
Hawaii |
Palmquist, Zoey |
5 |
Arkansas |
Parker, Hannah |
4 |
Arizona |
Patel, Shaalin |
45 |
South Carolina |
Phillips, Natalie |
42 |
Pennsylvania |
Radous, Colin |
32 |
Nevada |
Reott, Hayden |
38 |
North Dakota |
Robinson, Rachael |
24 |
Maryland |
Rockwell, Aneesha |
17 |
Illinois |
Rupp, Ian |
6 |
California |
Sheese, Micah |
35 |
New Mexico |
Sides, Rachel |
41 |
Oregon |
Spurlock, Noah |
42 |
Pennsylvania |
Sundaram, Suriya |
25 |
Massachusetts |
Tang, Zhuangyu |
44 |
Rhode Island |
Taylor, Kendall |
39 |
Ohio |
Terrell, Jamari |
19 |
Iowa |
Thongkhot, Fiat |
16 |
Idaho |
Thotli, Varun |
12 |
Florida |
Wadsworth, Emma |
51 |
Virginia |
Wang, Jinze |
6 |
California |
Wang, Lin |
55 |
Wisconsin |
Wang, Mingyao |
35 |
New Mexico |
Wang, Shupeng |
24 |
Maryland |
Wang, Xinyu |
38 |
North Dakota |
To be Continued
Name |
State FIP |
State |
Wentzel, John |
13 |
Georgia |
Werntz, Cole |
41 |
Oregon |
Yi, Eleanor |
32 |
Nevada |
Zhang, Chaoran |
26 |
Michigan |
Zhang, Peter |
20 |
Kansas |
Overview of assignment and what you will submit: Generate a table reporting summary statistics of various samples. Write one to two paragraphs summarizing, characterizing, and noting the similarities or dissimilarities between the samples. You will submit a paper copy of your write-up with the summary statis- tics table and a print-out of your do-file at the beginning of class on Tuesday, 09/26.
We will generate three subsamples for our analysis. The first sample consists of all individuals between the ages of 19 and 65 who are not on active duty. The second sample consists of individuals in the labor force who reported a wage or salary in 2020 (the 2021 ACS reports income from the prior year). The third sample includes only individuals between 29 and 40 years old who reported a wage or salary and participated in the labor force. We will use the latter sample to estimate the returns to education.
Your first homework assignment will require you to complete a process known as data cleaning. Researchers often need to recode or generate new variables from survey data. The below commands will walk you through how to “clean ACS data” to estimate the returns to education and the probability that an individual participates in the labor force.
The task of data cleaning is often an arduous one. To cultivate skills in command-based coding and data analytics using Stata, I provide code enabling us to use the ACS data for regression analysis. There is one exception (see below), where I ask you to generate a dummy variable indicating whether a person is em- ployed. All other variable recoding or generation processes are provided in this section.
|
|
|
In Stata to indicate a range, e.g., tabulate incwage between 20,000 and 40,000, i.e., 20, 000 incwage 40, 000, the code is tab incwage if incwage>=20000 & incwage<=40000. Suppose you want a “or” statement, use. For example, you want a count of respondents who are married: count if marst==1 marst==2, where a value of one indicates a married person and two indicates married but separated (for assigned values and designations regarding marital status: label list marst_lbl). The vertical line | denotes “or” and & denotes “and” in Stata.
It is best practice to describe (label) newly generated variables. It will describe the variable enabling you to determine what it represents or measures when referring back to it. I am leaving variable labeling to you. It is not something you need to do, but it may be helpful later in the term.
label var variable_name "Description"
use path/acs_2021_X.dta, clear
where path denotes the directory path where the data file is saved on your computer. The “X” is a place holder for the State FIP code, e.g., if assigned California, the State FIP code is 6.
Define sample: To estimate the returns to education and labor force participation, we need to define the appropriate subsamples for analysis.
Keep all observations between the ages of 19 and 65.
keep if age>=19 & age<=65
gen lf=(labforce==2)
gen attending=(school==2)
tab birthqtr, gen(qtr)
gen byear=year-age
gen age2=age^2
gen married=(marst==1 | marst==2)
gen marchlt5=married∗nchlt5
gen male=(sex==1)
gen white=(race==1 & hispan==0)
gen black=(race==2)
gen asian=(race>=4 & race<=6)
gen hispan2=(hispan>=1 & hispan<=4)
gen drace=(race!=1)
gen msa=(pwtype==1 | pwtype==2 | pwtype==3 | pwtype==4 | pwtype==5)
gen grade=.
replace grade=0 if educd>=0 & educd<=12 replace grade=1 if educd==14
replace grade=2 if educd==15 replace grade=3 if educd==16 replace grade=4 if educd==17 replace grade=5 if educd==22 replace grade=6 if educd==23 replace grade=7 if educd==25 replace grade=8 if educd==26 replace grade=9 if educd==30 replace grade=10 if educd==40
replace grade=11 if educd==50 | educd==61
replace grade=12 if educd==60 | educd==62 | educd==63 | educd==64 replace grade=12.5 if educd==65
replace grade=13 if educd==70 replace grade=13.5 if educd==71
replace grade=14 if educd>=80 & educd<=83 replace grade=15.5 if educd==100
replace grade=16 if educd==101 replace grade=18 if educd==114 replace grade=19 if educd==115
replace grade=20 if educd==116
gen occupation=occsoc
replace occupation=subinstr(occupation,"X","0",.) replace occupation=subinstr(occupation,"Y","0",.) destring occupation, replace
replace occupation=floor(occupation/10000)
keep if occupation<55 //Keeping observations not on active duty
Save data with the above changes: We now have our first subsample of the 2021 ACS, which we will refer to as the “Main Sample,” but save it as sample1. To save, follow the command below.
save path/acs_2021_state_sample1.dta, replace
where path denotes the directory path (folder location) and state denotes your assigned state, e.g., Michigan. The option replace allows you to overwrite an existing file. Suppose you made changes to a previously saved data file. The option replace allows you to overwrite the old file with the new changes.
You will replicate Table 2 and report each stated variable’s mean and standard deviation. Important: The variable labels in the table below may differ from the variable labels in your acs_2021_state_sample1 data file. For example, in the data file, the variable grade reports years of schooling, but we will label it “Education” in the table.
In Stata use the sum command to report the mean and standard deviation of the variables listed in Table 2 for the Main Sample. You will report the standard deviation in parentheses below the mean (see the below examples).
To generate summary statistics, call the “Main Sample” data file
use path/acs_2021_state_sample1.dta, clear
After uploading the data file, use the sum command as instructed above. For example, sum grade.
We will now generate our second subsample, consisting of individuals who report participating in the labor force (employed or unemployed) and a wage or salary. Before we can obtain the mean and standard devi- ation for the variables listed in the sample, we need to clean the data further. First call in sample1: use path/acs_2021_state_sample1.dta, clear
Next, keep observations that meet the following criteria.
drop if incwage==999999 | incwage==999998 | incwage==0 | incwage==.
drop if empstat==0 | empstat==3
label list uhrswork_lbl for top and bottom codes)
drop if uhrswork==99 | uhrswork==0
drop if wkswork1==0
drop if uhrswork<10
drop if school==2
Generating an imputed hourly wage rate:
gen hwage=(incwage/wkswork1)/uhrswork
Save data with the above changes: We now have our second subsample of the 2021 ACS, which we will refer to as the “Worked: Ages 19-65” (the term worked denotes respondents reporting an income in 2020) To save, follow the command below.
save path/acs_2021_state_worked1965.dta, replace
To generate summary statistics, call the “Employed Sample: Ages 19-65” data file
use path/acs_2021_state_worked1965.dta, clear
After uploading the data file, use the sum command as instructed above. For example, sum grade. You will input each variable’s mean and standard deviation under the column “Employed: Ages 19-65” in Table 2.
We will now generate our third subsample, consisting of individuals 29 to 40 years of age who report partic- ipating in the labor force (employed or unemployed) and an income in 2020. Before we can obtain the mean and standard deviation for the variables listed in the sample, we need to clean the data further. First call in the “Worked: Ages 19-65” sample: use path/acs_2021_state_worked1965.dta, clear
Next, keep observations that meet the following criteria:
keep if age>=29 & age<=40 & school!=2
Save data with the above changes: We now have our third subsample of the 2021 ACS, which we will refer to as the “Worked: Ages 29-40.” To save, follow the command below:
save path/acs_2021_state_worked2940.dta, replace
We will use the subsample of 19 to 40-year-old respondents who are not in school and reported a 2020 in- come to estimate the returns to education. The sample consists of individuals who likely completed intended educational pursuits and, more recently, finished schooling relative to older workers.
To generate summary statistics, call the “Employed Sample: Ages 29-40” data file
use path/acs_2021_state_worked2940.dta, clear
After uploading the data file, use the sum command as instructed above. For example, sum grade. Repli- cate Table 2 below and input the mean and standard deviation for each variable in each sample. Make sure to state standard deviations in parentheses. Please make note of the blank cells under the “Main Sample” column. We do not have an hourly wage variable for that sample. It includes respondents who did not report an income. The sample average wage would not accurately characterize the average worker income. Thus, we do not want to report it for the “Main Sample."
Table 2: Summary Statistics for Alabama
|
Main Sample∗ (Ages 19-65) |
Employed† (Ages 19-65) |
Employed‡ (Ages 29-40) |
Years of Schooling |
13.3340 |
13.8052 |
13.9727 |
|
(2.9637) |
(2.7869) |
(2.8296) |
Age |
43.5709 |
43.4261 |
34.6538 |
|
(13.9893) |
(12.6347) |
(3.5066) |
Male |
0.4879 |
0.5260 |
0.5236 |
|
(0.4999) |
(0.4993) |
(0.4995) |
White |
0.6748 |
0.7030 |
0.6973 |
|
(0.4685) |
(0.4570) |
(0.4595) |
Black |
0.2222 |
0.1983 |
0.1921 |
|
(0.4158) |
(0.3988) |
(0.3940) |
Asian |
0.0176 |
0.0173 |
0.0154 |
|
(0.1317) |
(0.1302) |
(0.1233) |
Hispanic |
0.0397 |
0.0376 |
0.0456 |
|
(0.1952) |
(0.1902) |
(0.2086) |
Married |
0.5261 |
0.5968 |
0.5902 |
|
(0.4993) |
(0.4906) |
(0.4918) |
Children1 |
0.6909 |
0.8088 |
1.2658 |
|
(1.0541) |
(1.0789) |
(1.2243) |
Works in MSA |
0.3425 |
0.5091 |
0.5154 |
|
(0.4746) |
(0.4999) |
(0.4998) |
Employed |
0.6558 |
0.9760 |
0.9743 |
|
(0.4751) |
(0.1530) |
(0.1583) |
Hourly Wage |
|
29.4113 |
28.4412 |
|
|
(48.3768) |
(55.5631) |
N |
28,388 |
16,341 |
4,278 |
Standard deviation in parentheses
1 Number of children living in the household
∗ Includes individuals between the age of 19 and 65
† includes individuals between the age of 19 and 65 and reported an income in 2020
‡ includes individuals between the age of 19 and 40 and reported and income in 2020
The below excerpt is from a published study on returns to source country human capital that I along with a coauthor wrote. I am including the excerpt for reference. You must submit your own work.
“We use data from the New Immigrant Survey (NIS), 2003. The NIS provides extensive infor- mation on new immigrants to the U.S., who received their permanent residency (green card) in 2002-2003. 8573 adult immigrants completed interviews. If the spouse of a principal immi- grant was also an immigrant, then the spouse was also interviewed. In all, 4915 spouses were interviewed. Therefore, the total number of foreign-born immigrants interviewed who received their green card between 2002 and 2003 was 13488. Our study design requires us to focus on immigrants who worked in their source countries before immigrating to the U.S. and worked in the U.S. after immigrating to the U.S. Out of 13488 immigrants, 6977 (59%) held at least one job in their source countries before moving to the U.S. We focus on only those immigrants who were between the ages of 16 and 65 (both included) at the time of immigrating to the U.S. This reduced the sample size to 5919 immigrants. We further restrict the sample based on the avail- ability of covariates, those who report participating in the U.S. labor market after immigrating, and those who have an accurate work history in their source countries. The sample size after accounting for the availability of covariates and labor market participation is 2713. However, approximately nine percent of that sample have stated work histories where the start of their first source country job is after the completion of their last source country job or there is an overlap between the start and end dates of their first and last source country jobs. We omit these observations from our analysis, which leaves a sample of immigrants who participated in the
U.S. labor market of 2460. T· ·a·ble 2 presents the summary statistics for all immigrants (column 1), stayers (columns 2-4), and switchers (columns 5-7). There are three samples of stayers (and switchers) because we define stayers (and switchers) based on the 1, 2, and 3-digit occupational coding. Among all
workers 40.2% are female. The percentage of female workers varies between 37.6% and 39.5% among stayers and 40.5% and 42% among the switcher sample. The average number of years of education among all workers is 13.82 years. Stayers have slightly more education than switch- ers. Average education varies between 14.9 and 14.38 years among the stayer samples, and they vary between 13.44 and 13.51 years for the switcher samples. Stayers are more proficient in English than switchers are. In our data, between 53.3% and 61.3% of stayers have “very good” English speaking skills. On the other hand, between 32.7% and 35.2% of switchers have an En- glish proficiency categorized as “very good.” We use interviewer reported measure for fluency in spoken English, which is available for all interviewees. The measure takes a value of one through four with one for very good English to four for poor English. The English proficiency measure is given a value of five if the interview was conducted in a language other than English because the interviewees were not comfortable in answering questions in English. ”
Overview of assignment and what you will submit: To estimate the pecuniary return to education, our analysis uses only individuals who report an income. It is, therefore, of interest to understand the factors influencing the likelihood of participating in the labor force. For homework assignment 2, you will model and quantify an individual’s probability of participating in the labor force using the ordinary least squares and logit estimators (see Chapter 13). Estimate each specification stated below for all individuals and fe- males and males separately. Report your findings by replicating Table 3, and include the table in your term
project. You must include a write-up of the results and discuss how the interaction between married and the number of children under the age of five in the household affected the estimates for each group. What is the economic significance of the results? Additionally, discuss whether the effect of years of completed school on labor force participation is robust to the inclusion of the interaction term. What inference, if any, do you draw from that result?
Objective: We want to explain changes in the probability that an individual participates in the labor force. Use the acs_2021_state_sample1.dta data file, estimate the below labor force participation models using OLS (linear probability model) and logit estimators for all individuals, females only, and males only between the ages 19 and 65.
The linear probability model for each specification is:
l fi = β0 + β1 gradei + β2 agei + β3 dracei + β4 marriedi + β5 malei + β6 nchlt5i + εi
l fi = β0 + β1 gradei + β2 agei + β3 dracei + β4 marriedi + β5 malei + β6 nchlt5i + β7marchlt5i + εi and the standard documentation format for the logit equation for each specification is:
L : Pr(l fi = 1) = β0 + β1 gradei + β2 agei + +β3 dracei + β4 marriedi + β5 malei + β6 nchlt5i + εi
L : Pr(l fi = 1) = β0 + β1 gradei + β2 agei + +β3 dracei + β4 marriedi + β5 malei + β6 nchlt5i
+ β7marchlt5i + εi
The Stata commands to estimate βk using OLS and Logit are: OLS: reg y x1 x2 x3 . . . xK
Logit: logit y x1 x2 x3 . . . xK
When estimating the labor force participation equation, we want to exclude individuals attending school, which requires including a qualifier with the reg and logit commands. To do so, you will include an “if” statement after the last explanatory variable, limiting the analysis to only those observations not in school. Additionally, we want to use heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) standard er- rors (vce(robust)). An example with an “if” statement and specifying HAC standard errors: reg y x if attending==0, vce(robust)
Estimating the regression models separately for females and males with the school attendance qualifier re- quires you to include the & between the two qualifying statements. For example, reg y x if attending==0 & male==0, vce(robust).
Replicate the below table (12 sets of estimates), report the results (standard errors in parentheses), sample size (N), and indicate significance levels using asterisks placed in the superscript of the estimate (*, **,
*** indicates significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively). Note that the odd-number columns exclude the married and number of children under the age of five in the household interaction term, while the even-numbered columns report the OLS and logit estimates with the interaction term included in the specification.
Table 3: Labor Force Participation: Alabama
|
|
All |
|
|
|
FeMales |
|
|
|
Males |
|
|
OLS |
OLS |
|
Logit |
Logit |
OLS |
OLS Logit |
Logit |
OLS |
OLS |
|
Logit |
Logit |
(1) |
(2) |
|
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) (7) |
(8) |
(9) |
(10) |
|
(11) |
(12) |
Education 0.0333*** 0.0335*** 0.1736*** 0.1747*** |
0.0391*** 0.0394*** 0.1934*** 0.1953*** |
0.0266*** 0.0268*** 0.1569*** 0.1570*** |
||||||||||
(0.0009) (0.0009) (0.0058) (0.0059) |
(0.0013) (0.0013) (0.0084) (0.0085) |
(0.0012) (0.0012) (0.0083) (0.0083) |
||||||||||
Age -0.0085*** -0.0085*** -0.0437*** -0.0439*** |
-0.0088*** -0.0088*** -0.0430*** -0.0431*** |
-0.0090*** -0.0091*** -0.0512*** -0.0514*** |
||||||||||
(0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0013) (0.0013) |
(0.0003) (0.0003) (0.0018) (0.0018) |
(0.0003) (0.0003) (0.0019) (0.0019) |
||||||||||
Race† -0.0206*** -0.0218*** -0.1101*** -0.1155*** |
0.0204** 0.0186** 0.0961** 0.0878** |
-0.0705*** -0.0706*** -0.4228*** -0.4226*** |
||||||||||
(0.0062) (0.0062) (0.0318) (0.0318) |
(0.0088) (0.0088) (0.0432) (0.0433) |
(0.0084) (0.0084) (0.0475) (0.0476) |
||||||||||
Male 0.1050*** 0.1071*** 0.5551*** 0.5649*** |
|
|
||||||||||
(0.0054) (0.0054) (0.0290) (0.0291) |
|
|
||||||||||
Married 0.1128*** 0.1214*** 0.5679*** 0.6074*** |
0.0152* 0.0246*** 0.0621 0.1068** |
0.2174*** 0.2266*** 1.2345*** 1.2490*** |
||||||||||
(0.0060) (0.0061) (0.0306) (0.0316) |
(0.0085) (0.0088) (0.0412) (0.0427) |
(0.0081) (0.0083) (0.0478) (0.0487) |
||||||||||
Children Less Than 5 y.o. -0.0442*** 0.0217 -0.2252*** 0.0617 |
-0.1076*** -0.0547*** -0.5420*** -0.3002*** |
0.0132** 0.1284*** 0.5989*** 0.8447*** |
||||||||||
(0.0063) (0.0134) (0.0384) (0.0732) |
(0.0096) (0.0165) (0.0462) (0.0785) |
(0.0062) (0.0179) (0.1052) (0.1985) |
||||||||||
Married × Children -0.0879*** -0.4077*** (0.0149) (0.0828) |
-0.0773*** -0.3536*** (0.0196) (0.0911) |
-0.1378*** -0.3655 (0.0187) (0.2300) |
||||||||||
Constant 0.5305*** 0.5235*** 0.0602 0.0287 |
0.5207*** 0.5120*** 0.0246 -0.0232 |
0.6978*** 0.6938*** 0.9209*** 0.9214*** |
||||||||||
(0.0171) (0.0172) (0.1005) (0.1010) |
(0.0254) (0.0255) (0.1437) (0.1448) |
(0.0215) (0.0215) (0.1391) (0.1389) |
||||||||||
N |
25,777 |
25,777 |
25,777 |
25,777 |
13,089 |
13,089 |
13,089 |
13,089 |
12,688 |
12,688 |
12,688 |
12,688 |
Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses
* 0.10, ** 0.05, and *** 0.01 denote significance levels
† Race indicates whether a respondent self-identified other than White
Overview of assignment and what you will submit: State the below wage equation, define the variables, and discuss the model. Estimate the wage equation using OLS and discuss the estimated return to an addi- tional year of schooling for all workers and separately for female and male workers.
Using the acs_2021_state_employed2940.dta, estimate the wage equation using OLS and report the grade coefficient (β1) for all workers. Then separately estimate the return to an additional year of schooling for female and male workers. You only need to report the coefficient estimate for grade (βˆ1), standard error
SE(βˆ1), significance level (denoted by asterisks on the coefficient estimate, see below), R2, and sample size (N). Replicate Table 4 and report the OLS estimates and statistics for columns (1), (3), and (5). We will estimate the returns to education using Two-stage Least Squares (2SLS) for the last homework assignment.
Before we proceed with estimating the return to an additional year of schooling, we need to generate a few more variables.
gen lnw=ln(hwage)
tab byear, gen(birthyear)
The variable byear was generated in the first homework assignment. It reports a respondents birth year. The above command tabulates byear and generates a dummy variable for each birth year in the sample, e.g., birthyear1, birthyear2, ... , birthyear11.
B
lnwi = β0 + β1 gradei + β2 agei + β3 malei + β4 dracei + β5 msai + ∑ βb birthyearbi + εi (1)
b=1
I am providing the code for estimating equation (1) using acs_2021_state_worked940.dta for all workers. You will need to amend the code to separately estimate the wage equation for female and male workers (refer to assignment three for how to use a qualifier to estimate a subsample, e.g, female workers only). When estimating the wage equation for female and male workers, you must drop the explanatory variable male from the wage equation.
reg lnw grade age male drace msa birthyear1-birthyear11, vce(robust)
Notes
|
All |
|
Females |
Males |
||
OLS |
|
2SLS |
OLS |
2SLS |
OLS |
2SLS |
(1) |
|
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
Education |
0.0888*** |
0.0118 |
0.0997*** |
0.0865** |
0.0797*** |
0.0529 |
|
(0.0048) |
(0.0450) |
(0.0077) |
(0.0388) |
(0.0059) |
(0.0359) |
F† |
|
1.08 |
|
1.49 |
|
1.44 |
R2 |
0.16 |
0.09 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
N |
4,278 |
4,278 |
2,038 |
2,038 |
2,240 |
2,240 |
Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses
* 0.10, ** 0.05, and *** 0.01 denote significance levels Additional controls: age, sex, race, msa, birth year
† Test for weak instruments
The below excerpt come from a research article of mine studying the returns to immigrant source country human capital. I am including the excerpt for reference. You must submit your own work.
“We start by estimating the following wage regression (non-linear terms not shown in the equa- tion to reduce clutter).
wi = α + β GEi + Xiψ + εi (2)
The dependent variable, wi, is the (log of) hourly wage rate of immigrant i in the first U.S. job. The vector of individual characteristics is denoted by Xi and includes the immigrant’s years of education in source country, gender, proficiency in English, visa type, number of years between last source country job and first U.S. job, region of residence in the U.S., source country fixed effects, and U.S. entry year fixed effects. Since previous literature on transferability of source country work experience has only included returns to GE, we start with a specification where we include only GE. We use a flexible functional form with up to the fourth order work experience terms as suggested by Murphy (1990). They show that standard (quadratic) Mincer earnings function may understate the early career earnings growth and may overstate mid-career earnings growth. In our regressions, we divide squared, cubed, and quartic terms by 1000 to re-scale the coefficients.
Table X presents the results based on the first U.S. wage regressions. We estimate this equa- tion for all workers (column 1) and then separately for stayers (columns 2-4) and switchers (columns 5-7). The classification of who is a stayer (or switcher) depends on the granularity of occupational definitions. When we define occupation at the 1-digit level, we have 1006 stayers and 1454 switchers. At the 2-digit level, we have 694 stayers and 1766 switchers. At the 3-digit level, we have 551 stayers and 1909 switchers. ”
|
Overview of assignment and what you will submit: As we saw in chapter 6, OLS does not consistently es- timate βk when COV (xk, ε) = 0. The method of instrumental variables, specifically two-staged least squares (2SLS), provides a general solution to the endogeneity problem (chapter 14). Following Angrist and Kreuger (1990) (closely but not exactly) , we define a set of exogenous variables
z = (1, age, male, drace, msa, birthyear1, birthyear2,..., birthyear11, qtr1 × birthyear1, qtr1 × birthyear2, , qtr3 × birthyear11)
to instrument for grade. We can write the reduced form equation for grade as
gradei = α0 + α1agei + α3malei + α4dracei + α5msai + ∑δb birthyearib
b
+ ∑∑γb j birthyearib × qrti j + ui
b j
|
where gradei is the education of the ith individual, agei, dracei, and msai are covariates (independent vari- ables) that influence the hourly wage of the ith individuals, and birthyearib is a binary variable indicating whether an individual as born in year b (b = 1, 2, 3, . . . , 11). The interaction terms between birth year and quarter of birth (qtr birthyear) are the excluded instrumental variables. The reference categories for each excluded instrument variable is if an individual was born in the fourth quarter of a year and the year of birth for the youngest worker (birthyear12).
|
|
Using acs_2021_state_employed2940.dta, estimate the wage equation using 2SLS and report the estimated coefficient of grade for all workers. Then separately, estimate the return to an additional year of schooling for female and male workers. You only need to report the coefficient estimate for grade (β1), standard error SE(β1), significance level (denoted by asterisks on the coefficient estimate, see below), R2 (the reported Centered R2), sample size (N), and the test for weak instruments’ F statistic. Report the estimates and statistics in columns (2), (4), and (6) in Table 4.
qui tab byear local num=r(r)
forvalues k=1(1)‘num'{ forvalues y=1(1)4 {
gen yearqtr‘k'_‘y'=birthyear‘k'∗qtr‘y'
}
}
I am providing the code for estimating equation (1) using the two-stage least squares estimator. You will need to amend the code to separately estimate the wage equation for female and male workers. When esti- mating the wage equation for female and male workers, you must drop the explanatory variable male from the equation. Note, you will need to install the ivreg2 package and a complementary package called ranktest to execute the two-stage least squares estimator in Stata. To install the packages, go to the results window, click in the command line and type ssc install ivreg2 and hit the Enter/return key. Then, type ssc install ranktest in the command window, and hit the Enter/return key).
ivreg2 lnw (grade=yearqtr1_1 yearqtr1_2 /∗
∗/ yearqtr1_3 yearqtr2_1 yearqtr2_2 yearqtr2_3 yearqtr3_1 yearqtr3_2 /∗
∗/ yearqtr3_3 yearqtr4_1 yearqtr4_2 yearqtr4_3 yearqtr5_1 yearqtr5_2 /∗
∗/ yearqtr5_3 yearqtr6_1 yearqtr6_2 yearqtr6_3 yearqtr7_1 yearqtr7_2 /∗
∗/ yearqtr7_3 yearqtr8_1 yearqtr8_2 yearqtr8_3 yearqtr9_1 yearqtr9_2 /∗
∗/ yearqtr9_3 yearqtr10_1 yearqtr10_2 yearqtr10_3 yearqtr11_1 /∗
∗/ yearqtr11_2 yearqtr11_3) age male drace msa /∗
∗/ birthyear1-birthyear11, r
vce(robust) with the ivreg2 command. Test For Weak Instruments
When conducting a test for weak instruments, the associated test statistic is an F-statistic. That is the F you will report along with your estimates in Table 4. On your do-file, you must hard code in the test, as shown in class. I will deduct points if you report a Wald F statistic using a Stata command other than what was presented in class. Recall that an F-test requires estimating an unrestricted and restricted model. Use your class notes and the posted Stata demonstration for two-stage least squares for reference.
Take your results from Section 3 and write an analysis on the return to education and labor force participa- tion following the outline in Section 2. Remember to attach your working do-file. You must submit your term project on Tuesday, 12/05 at the beginning of the class period.
This Question Hasn’t Been Answered Yet! Do You Want an Accurate, Detailed, and Original Model Answer for This Question?
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.