Call/WhatsApp/Text: +44 20 3289 5183

Question: The Ethics of Abortion. Use as primary sources the two essays Thomson and Marquis’ and explain as carefully as you can the nature of abortion as an ethical problem.

26 Nov 2022,5:23 PM

 

The Ethics of Abortion. Use as primary sources the two essays Thomson and Marquis’ and explain as carefully as you can the nature of abortion as an ethical problem. Describe Thomson and Marquis’ views and explain how they differ and how they may, to some extent, overlap. Examine possible objec​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​tions to each view. Present your own view on the issue backing it up with solid reasons/arguments.

Expert answer

 

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in today's society. It has been an ethical problem for many years, and different moral approaches have been taken when looking at its morality. This paper will examine two essays written on abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense of Abortion" and Don Marquis’ "Why Abortion is Immoral".

 

Thomson believes that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy as long as it does not infringe upon someone else’s rights. Her argument holds that since the fetus cannot be considered a person with the same rights as any other human being, it cannot be considered wrong to abort it. Therefore, she argues that abortion should not be illegal unless it violates someone else’s rights.

 

Marquis takes a different approach to the morality of abortion. He argues that since the fetus has potential for a future like ours, it should be considered wrong to abort it just as killing any other person would be considered wrong. He does not believe that women have an absolute right to terminate their pregnancies, but rather that society must weigh whether or not this would lead to more harm than good in making such a decision.

 

One objection to Thomson's view is that her argument relies on the assumption that fetuses are not persons with moral standing, which may be disputed by some people who hold religious beliefs. Additionally, she fails to consider the possible emotional effects of abortion on the woman involved and how this could impact her right to make the decision.

 

An objection to Marquis' view is that his argument relies on an overemphasis on potentiality when it comes to determining whether or not something is wrong. He neglects to consider other factors such as quality of life, which could play a major role in determining whether or not terminating a pregnancy is ethical. Additionally, his argument does not consider how making abortions illegal could lead to more harm than good for those involved by forcing them into unsafe and potentially dangerous conditions.

 

In my opinion, abortion should be considered both morally permissible and legally permissible depending on the individual circumstances. Women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies and should be free from any judgment or condemnation regardless of their choices. Abortion should not be viewed as a simple matter of right and wrong, but rather as an issue that should be evaluated on a case by case basis. It is important to consider all factors involved in the decision and to respect the individual's right to choose what happens with their body and their life. Ultimately, it is up to each person to make the best decision for themselves and their situation.

Stuck Looking For A Model Original Answer To This Or Any Other
Question?


Related Questions

What Clients Say About Us

WhatsApp us