Mount King Books Publishing
Mount King Books Publishing was stablished two years ago by two friends, Jim King, and Brad Mount, who met in college while studying in Philadelphia, USA. Their business was successful and profitable in the first two years, largely due to contracts from two big businesses. The business was successful and profitable in the first two years, primarily due to contracts from two significant businesses. However, by the end of the third year, the company faced critical problems: they were unable to leverage all the new employees effectively, deliver eBooks to their customers on schedule, provide quality texts, or control costs.
In their third year of operation, they became very busy thanks to their third significant customer, a local college that required customized eBooks. They hired several part-time employees to help with their publishing business, but the printing orders from the college turned out to be very challenging.
Each customized eBook had different production steps, contents, and reprint approvals required, and different layouts and cover designs. Each eBook was a complex process that was produced just once, as these eBooks were all customized for each professor and course each semester. Each eBook had to be delivered on time and had to match precisely what the professors requested.
Understanding what each eBook needed had to be clearly documented and understood before starting production. Each eBook required a separate job order prepared that listed all the necessary steps to be completed so that tasks could be assigned to each worker. These job orders were also becoming a problem. Not all the steps needed were getting listed in each order. Often the estimates of time for each task were not completed until after the work was done, causing problems as workers were supposed to move on to new tasks but were still finishing their previous tasks. Some tasks required specialized equipment or skills, sometimes from other groups within Mount King Books.
Printing orders from college turned out to be very challenging. Not all new student hires were trained for all the printing and binding equipment used to print and assemble books. Some of them often made mistakes, some workers were called off from work due to other demands, and there were often not enough people available to finish all the work before deadlines.
Quality was a serious issue, as they had to provide quality texts. If there were quality problems with the printed product, they would have to spend time and money fixing defects in their products. Deliveries started slipping past their requested dates and times and the local college was unhappy as their eBook products reached campus late for use by professors and students.
To address these issues, Jim King asked Samantha, one of the new part-time employees hired who had taken a project management course at college, to join them as a project associate or project manager to introduce project management practices and help them tide over their current crisis.
Samantha starts developing a template for job orders. This template should list all possible tasks that should be performed in producing an eBook for the college. These tasks could be broken down into different phases of the work.
In her new role as a project manager, Samantha was also trying to institute risk management. She looked at what was happening in the business, talked about it with the owners and employees and heard about the college's unhappiness. As she did this, she started identifying potential risks. As she went along, she started doing more proactive risk analysis and risk response planning, and as she did, surprises and issues were reduced. By talking with stakeholders and addressing their concerns, communication with stakeholders was also enhanced.
Within nine months, Samantha had fully turned things around and enhanced communication with stakeholders significantly. Brad and Jim noted that the company delivered projects on schedule, the quality processes worked, and customers were happy with the products!
Complete the following tasks based on the Mount King Books Publishing scenario.
[10 points]
Table 1 Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Risk Event |
Likelihood |
Impact |
Detection Difficulty |
Risk Value |
Project Stage |
#1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Weights: 1 = ‘low’ to 5 = ‘high’
Table 3 Risk Register
Risk Event |
Severity* |
Response |
Contingency Plan |
Trigger |
Who is Responsible |
#1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Severity value as identified - per FMEA table
Surprisingly she identified delays in obtaining necessary reprint permissions from certain publishers were the largest cause of problems. Production staff calling in sick was the next most frequent problem, and customer changes were the root cause of another 20% of the issues. Looking at this analysis, what recommendations might you make to address the three key problem areas in eBook projects? [10 points]
What type of team decision making bias being displayed in this scenario? Propose at least two solutions that can be implemented to prevent or reduce the negative effects of such biases on the decision-making process. [9 points]
https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2023/05/07/9667-tvj_20_48_17_05-opsmgt357-2.pdf
https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2023/05/07/9667-YUu_20_48_07_06-opsmgt357-1.pdf
https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2023/05/07/9667-ccZ_20_47_58_03-opsmgt357-2.pdf
https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2023/05/07/9667-d14_20_47_49_04-opsmgt357-2.pdf
https://apaxresearchers.com/storage/files/2023/05/07/9667-jdX_20_47_39_02-opsmgt357-2.pdf
This Question Hasn’t Been Answered Yet! Do You Want an Accurate, Detailed, and Original Model Answer for This Question?
Copyright © 2012 - 2023 Apaxresearchers - All Rights Reserved.